These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36931122)

  • 1. Prognostic potential of reading art in brain damage and the possible contribution of non-invasive brain stimulation: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski, Blanca T.M. Spee, et al.
    Slaby RJ; Cappa S; Cattaneo Z
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Jul; 45():25-28. PubMed ID: 36931122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creativity, art and brain: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Bogousslavsky J
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Mar; 44():116-118. PubMed ID: 36634557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Art as a window to altered perception? - A possible understanding of neurodegenerative diseases through the philosophy of Konrad Fiedler: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Hayn-Leichsenring GU
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Mar; 44():160-162. PubMed ID: 36701911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Goldstein's 'catastrophic reactions' reinterpreted as neuroaesthetic 'signatures': Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Stahnisch FW
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Mar; 44():91-93. PubMed ID: 36563478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bridging neurodegenerative diseases and artistic expressivity: The significance of testable models and causal inference: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).
    Kathofer M; Leder H; Crone JS
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Jul; 45():66-70. PubMed ID: 37167925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No sound evidence supports the notion that we can "read" art: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).
    Nadal M; Skov M
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Mar; 44():110-112. PubMed ID: 36610203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can we "read" art…at all? A psychometric perspective on the possibility of measuring artwork attributes: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).
    Myszkowski N
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Mar; 44():48-50. PubMed ID: 36493628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From brain images to drawings - New insights informing the creativity-psychopathology debate: Commentary on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al.
    Benedek M; Fink A
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Mar; 44():179-183. PubMed ID: 36773388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease.
    Pelowski M; Spee BTM; Arato J; Dörflinger F; Ishizu T; Richard A
    Phys Life Rev; 2022 Dec; 43():32-95. PubMed ID: 36179555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What art can tell us about the human brain, in health and disease: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Bloem BR; Volpe D
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Jul; 45():52-55. PubMed ID: 37004337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are neurodegenerative disorders causing characteristic changes in visual artwork?: Commentary on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by M. Pelowski, B.T.M. Spee, J. Arato, F. Dörflinger, T. Ishizu, A. Richard.
    Treven M
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Mar; 44():102-104. PubMed ID: 36586307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The hare and the honey: Health care as transformative learning: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by Pelowski et al.
    Koksma J; Stap TB
    Phys Life Rev; 2023 Jul; 45():3-5. PubMed ID: 36907009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of the Vienna Integrated Model of Art Perception for art-based interventions in clinical populations: Comment on "Move me, astonish me... delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Taruffi L; Koelsch S
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():145-147. PubMed ID: 28648891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which brain networks related to art perception are we talking about?: Comment on "Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Ayala FJ; Cela-Conde CJ
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():133-134. PubMed ID: 28528962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The forgotten artist: Why to consider intentions and interaction in a model of aesthetic experience: Comment on "Move me, astonish me... delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Brattico E; Brattico P; Vuust P
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():128-130. PubMed ID: 28645699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representing the sublime in the VIMAP and empirical aesthetics: Reviving Edmund Burke's A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origins of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful: Comment on "Move me, astonish me... delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Hur YJ; McManus IC
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():135-137. PubMed ID: 28566231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beauty and sublime: Comment on "Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Perlovsky L
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():150-151. PubMed ID: 28478916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ugliness as the fourth wall-breaker: Comment on "Move me, astonish me... delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Ishizu T; Sakamoto Y
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():138-139. PubMed ID: 28602723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aesthetic episodes, domains, and the mind: Comment on: "Move me, astonish me... delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Jacobsen T
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():143-144. PubMed ID: 28460823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adding Gestalt to the picture: Comment on "Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates" by Matthew Pelowski et al.
    Wagemans J
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():155-158. PubMed ID: 28602721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.