These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36931821)

  • 21. Variability in intensively assessed mood: Systematic sources and factor structure in outpatients with opioid use disorder.
    Stull SW; Mogle J; Bertz JW; Burgess-Hull AJ; Panlilio LV; Lanza ST; Preston KL; Epstein DH
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Oct; 34(10):966-977. PubMed ID: 35980695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practical considerations for evaluating reliability in ambulatory assessment studies.
    Calamia M
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Mar; 31(3):285-291. PubMed ID: 30802114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Coordinated Analysis of Variance in Affect in Daily Life.
    Scott SB; Sliwinski MJ; Zawadzki M; Stawski RS; Kim J; Marcusson-Clavertz D; Lanza ST; Conroy DE; Buxton O; Almeida DM; Smyth JM
    Assessment; 2020 Dec; 27(8):1683-1698. PubMed ID: 30198310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of a Brief Measure of Aggression for Ecological Momentary Assessment Research: The Aggression-ES-A.
    Murray AL; Eisner M; Ribeaud D; Booth T
    Assessment; 2022 Mar; 29(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 33256467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The dynamics of persisting through distress: Development of a Momentary Distress Intolerance Scale using ecological momentary assessment.
    Veilleux JC; Hill MA; Skinner KD; Pollert GA; Baker DE; Spero KD
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1468-1478. PubMed ID: 29888946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identifying profiles of affective change: An ecological momentary assessment of flourishers.
    Winter T; Conner TS; Jose PE
    Emotion; 2021 Apr; 21(3):584-594. PubMed ID: 32212744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ambulatory assessment of rumination and worry: Capturing perseverative cognitions in children's daily life.
    Kramer AC; Neubauer AB; Leonhardt A; Brose A; Dirk J; Schmiedek F
    Psychol Assess; 2021 Sep; 33(9):827-842. PubMed ID: 33970655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Food Allergy (PANAS-FA): Adaptation and psychometric properties.
    Coelho GLH; Byrne A; Hourihane J; DunnGalvin A
    World Allergy Organ J; 2021 Dec; 14(12):100615. PubMed ID: 34934473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation and psychometric properties of the Alcohol Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Are drinking emotions distinct from general emotions?
    Lac A; Donaldson CD
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2018 Feb; 32(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 29419310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Affect-specific empathy: Experience sampling and multilevel structural equation modeling provide a within-person perspective.
    Löchner N; Bückle S; Olderbak S
    Emotion; 2023 Apr; 23(3):708-721. PubMed ID: 35666909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development, validation, and comparison of self-report measures for positive and negative affect in intensive longitudinal research.
    Cloos L; Ceulemans E; Kuppens P
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Mar; 35(3):189-204. PubMed ID: 36480406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Little evidence for consistent initial elevation bias in self-reported momentary affect: A coordinated analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies.
    Cerino ES; Schneider S; Stone AA; Sliwinski MJ; Mogle J; Smyth JM
    Psychol Assess; 2022 May; 34(5):467-482. PubMed ID: 35175074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factor Structure of the PANAS With Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling in a Chinese Sample.
    Kim M; Wang Z
    Eval Health Prof; 2022 Jun; 45(2):157-167. PubMed ID: 33657889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring positive and negative affect and physiological hyperarousal among Serbian youth.
    Stevanovic D; Laurent J; Lakic A
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 22966821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The positive and negative affect schedule: psychometric properties of the korean version.
    Lim YJ; Yu BH; Kim DK; Kim JH
    Psychiatry Investig; 2010 Sep; 7(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20927304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the original and the short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).
    Gyollai A; Simor P; Koteles F; Demetrovics Z
    Neuropsychopharmacol Hung; 2011 Jun; 13(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 21677320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling momentary reciprocal associations between negative affect and craving for alcohol and cannabis using dynamic structural equation modeling.
    Waddell JT; Carpenter RW; Frumkin MR; McNamara IA; Ellingson JM
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38330353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Affectivity in danish patients with emotional disorders: assessing the validity of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).
    Hovmand OR; Reinholt N; Christensen AB; Eskildsen A; Bach B; Arendt M; Poulsen S; Hvenegaard M; Arnfred SM
    BMC Psychiatry; 2023 Dec; 23(1):943. PubMed ID: 38093282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The PANAS structure revisited: on the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples.
    Leue A; Beauducel A
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):215-25. PubMed ID: 21280952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Posttraumatic Growth in Patients with Malignant Bone Tumor: Relationships with Psychological Adjustment.
    Wang L; Chen S; Liu P; Zhu C; Hu M; Li Y; Tao Y; Huang Z; Zhou Y; Xiao T; Zhu X
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Oct; 19(10):2831-2838. PubMed ID: 30362309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.