These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36934281)

  • 1. Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bayani M; Raisolvaezin K; Almasi-Hashiani A; Mirhoseini SH
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):158. PubMed ID: 36934281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Waterline biofilm and the dental treatment facility: a review.
    Pederson ED; Stone ME; Ragain JC; Simecek JW
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(2):190-5; quiz 196-7. PubMed ID: 12004714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental unit waterlines: biofilms, disinfection and recurrence.
    Meiller TF; Depaola LG; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; Turng BF; Falkler WA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 130(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 9919033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines in Istanbul, Turkey.
    Göksay D; Cotuk A; Zeybek Z
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Dec; 147(1-3):265-9. PubMed ID: 18210208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disinfection methods of dental unit waterlines contamination: a systematic review.
    Wu M; Shi Z; Yu X; Xu Y; Jin X; Zhang L; Fu B
    J Med Microbiol; 2022 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 35670283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishing a laboratory model of dental unit waterlines bacterial biofilms using a CDC biofilm reactor.
    Yoon HY; Lee SY
    Biofouling; 2017 Nov; 33(10):917-926. PubMed ID: 29160100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental Unit Waterlines in Quito and Caracas Contaminated with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: A Potential Health Risk in Dental Practice.
    Castellano Realpe OJ; Gutiérrez JC; Sierra DA; Pazmiño Martínez LA; Prado Palacios YY; Echeverría G; de Waard JH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32244267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment.
    Lizzadro J; Mazzotta M; Girolamini L; Dormi A; Pellati T; Cristino S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30682855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibitory effect of PVDF tubes on biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines.
    Yabune T; Imazato S; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):780-6. PubMed ID: 16026668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing an ecologically relevant heterogeneous biofilm model for dental-unit waterlines.
    Lal S; Pearce M; Achilles-Day UE; Day JG; Morton LH; Crean SJ; Singhrao SK
    Biofouling; 2017 Jan; 33(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 27928939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial waterline contamination by
    Baudet A; Lizon J; Florentin A; Mortier É
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0396223. PubMed ID: 38652098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Microbiological and Free-Living Protozoa Contamination in Dental Unit Waterlines.
    Spagnolo AM; Sartini M; Cave DD; Casini B; Tuvo B; Cristina ML
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31344972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the bacterial load and antibiotic susceptibility of dental units.
    Güngör ND; Kadaifçiler DG; Peker OÖ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Mar; 186(3):1847-53. PubMed ID: 24197558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants.
    Tuttlebee CM; O'Donnell MJ; Keane CT; Russell RJ; Sullivan DJ; Falkiner F; Coleman DC
    J Hosp Infect; 2002 Nov; 52(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 12419272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three key factors influencing the bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: a 6-year survey from 2012 to 2017.
    Ji XY; Fei CN; Zhang Y; Liu J; Liu H; Song J
    Int Dent J; 2019 Jun; 69(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 30565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of acoustic waves in preventing Streptococcus mutans adhesion on dental unit water line.
    Pantanella F; Schippa S; Solimini A; Rosa L; Bettucci A; Berlutti F
    Ann Ig; 2019; 31(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30714608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental unit waterlines: review and product evaluation.
    Panagakos FS; Lassiter T; Kumar E
    J N J Dent Assoc; 2001; 72(2):20-5, 38. PubMed ID: 11484611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental unit waterline contamination: a review of research and findings from a clinic setting.
    Wirthlin MR; Roth M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Mar; 36(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 25822748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of a Water Disinfection Method Based on Osmosis and Chlorine Dioxide for the Prevention of Microbial Contamination in Dental Practices.
    Totaro M; Badalucco F; Papini F; Grassi N; Mannocci M; Baggiani M; Tuvo B; Casini B; Menchini Fabris GB; Baggiani A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.