133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36934506)
1. Meta-analysis of engineered nanoparticles dynamic aggregation in freshwater-like systems using machine learning techniques.
Yalezo N; Musee N
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 337():117739. PubMed ID: 36934506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning-based models to predict aquatic ecological risk for engineered nanoparticles: using hazard concentration for 5% of species as an endpoint.
Qi Q; Wang Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; 31(17):25114-25128. PubMed ID: 38467999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of meteorological drought and standardized precipitation index based on the random forest (RF), random tree (RT), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) models.
Elbeltagi A; Pande CB; Kumar M; Tolche AD; Singh SK; Kumar A; Vishwakarma DK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):43183-43202. PubMed ID: 36648725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of Plant Uptake and Translocation of Engineered Metallic Nanoparticles by Machine Learning.
Wang X; Liu L; Zhang W; Ma X
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 55(11):7491-7500. PubMed ID: 33999596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting river dissolved oxygen time series based on stand-alone models and hybrid wavelet-based models.
Xu C; Chen X; Zhang L
J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113085. PubMed ID: 34147993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the incubated river water quality indicator based on machine learning and deep learning paradigms: BOD5 Prediction.
Kim S; Alizamir M; Seo Y; Heddam S; Chung IM; Kim YO; Kisi O; Singh VP
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Sep; 19(12):12744-12773. PubMed ID: 36654020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of oxidative damage induced by nanoparticles via mechanism-driven machine learning approaches.
Wang X; Li F; Teng Y; Ji C; Wu H
Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 871():162103. PubMed ID: 36764549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stacked hybridization to enhance the performance of artificial neural networks (ANN) for prediction of water quality index in the Bagh river basin, India.
Kushwaha NL; Kudnar NS; Vishwakarma DK; Subeesh A; Jatav MS; Gaddikeri V; Ahmed AA; Abdelaty I
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31085. PubMed ID: 38784559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive modeling of blood pressure during hemodialysis: a comparison of linear model, random forest, support vector regression, XGBoost, LASSO regression and ensemble method.
Huang JC; Tsai YC; Wu PY; Lien YH; Chien CY; Kuo CF; Hung JF; Chen SC; Kuo CH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105536. PubMed ID: 32485511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water quality assessment of a river using deep learning Bi-LSTM methodology: forecasting and validation.
Khullar S; Singh N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(9):12875-12889. PubMed ID: 33988840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Groundwater level response identification by hybrid wavelet-machine learning conjunction models using meteorological data.
Samani S; Vadiati M; Nejatijahromi Z; Etebari B; Kisi O
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(9):22863-22884. PubMed ID: 36308648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting crop root concentration factors of organic contaminants with machine learning models.
Gao F; Shen Y; Brett Sallach J; Li H; Zhang W; Li Y; Liu C
J Hazard Mater; 2022 Feb; 424(Pt B):127437. PubMed ID: 34678561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Models for Accurate Estimation of Groundwater Nitrate Concentration.
Band SS; Janizadeh S; Pal SC; Chowdhuri I; Siabi Z; Norouzi A; Melesse AM; Shokri M; Mosavi A
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33053663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of jumbo drill penetration rate in underground mines using various machine learning approaches and traditional models.
Heydari S; Hoseinie SH; Bagherpour R
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8928. PubMed ID: 38637673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning for better prediction of seepage flow through embankment dams: Gaussian process regression versus SVR and RVM.
Bouchehed A; Laouacheria F; Heddam S; Djemili L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(9):24751-24763. PubMed ID: 36692714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning models to predict the delivered positions of Elekta multileaf collimator leaves for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Sivabhaskar S; Li R; Roy A; Kirby N; Fakhreddine M; Papanikolaou N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13667. PubMed ID: 35670318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing.
Javadi F; Qaderi K; Ahmadi MM; Rahimpour M; Madadi MR; Mahdavi-Meymand A
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19390. PubMed ID: 36371476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advanced machine learning model for better prediction accuracy of soil temperature at different depths.
Alizamir M; Kisi O; Ahmed AN; Mert C; Fai CM; Kim S; Kim NW; El-Shafie A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231055. PubMed ID: 32287272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Least square support vector machine-based variational mode decomposition: a new hybrid model for daily river water temperature modeling.
Heddam S; Ptak M; Sojka M; Kim S; Malik A; Kisi O; Zounemat-Kermani M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(47):71555-71582. PubMed ID: 35604598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of irrigation groundwater quality parameters using ANN, LSTM, and MLR models.
Kouadri S; Pande CB; Panneerselvam B; Moharir KN; Elbeltagi A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):21067-21091. PubMed ID: 34748181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
