These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36934522)

  • 1. Measuring water holding capacity in pork meat images using deep learning.
    de Sousa Reis VC; Ferreira IM; Durval MC; Antunes RC; Backes AR
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jun; 200():109159. PubMed ID: 36934522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of nitric oxide treatment on pork meat quality, microstructure, and total bacterial count during postmortem aging.
    Liu R; Yang L; Yang T; Qin M; Li K; Bao W; Wu M; Yu H; Wu S; Ge Q
    Meat Sci; 2022 Aug; 190():108806. PubMed ID: 35567902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The water-holding capacity of meat: A reference analytical method.
    Szmańko T; Lesiów T; Górecka J
    Food Chem; 2021 Mar; 357():129727. PubMed ID: 33964628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of oil-modified crosslinked starch as a new fat replacer on gel properties, water distribution, and microstructures of pork meat batter.
    Zhao X; Guo R; Li X; Wang X; Zeng L; Wen X; Huang Q
    Food Chem; 2023 May; 409():135337. PubMed ID: 36587514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Prediction of water holding capacity of fresh pork using near infrared spectroscopy].
    Hu YH; Guo KQ; Noguchi G; Kawano S; Satake T
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2009 Dec; 29(12):3259-62. PubMed ID: 20210145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid method for determining water-holding capacity in meat using video image analysis and simple formulae.
    Irie M; Izumo A; Mohri S
    Meat Sci; 1996; 42(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 22060304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting the water holding capacity of red meat products: a review of recent research advances.
    Cheng Q; Sun DW
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2008 Feb; 48(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18274969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of D65/10° and A/10° illuminant/observer systems for colour measurement of raw pork.
    Karamucki T; Jakubowska M
    Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment; 2021; 20(4):485-496. PubMed ID: 34724372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing the sarcoplasmic proteome of aged pork chops classified by purge loss.
    Johnson LG; Zhai C; Reever LM; Prusa KJ; Nair MN; Huff-Lonergan E; Lonergan SM
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36751720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of nutritional modifications on the water-holding capacity of fresh pork: a review.
    Apple JK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():43-58. PubMed ID: 17988250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein carbonylation and water-holding capacity of pork subjected to frozen storage: effect of muscle type, premincing, and packaging.
    Estévez M; Ventanas S; Heinonen M; Puolanne E
    J Agric Food Chem; 2011 May; 59(10):5435-43. PubMed ID: 21506554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of ageing on the water-holding capacity of pork: role of cytoskeletal proteins.
    Kristensen L; Purslow PP
    Meat Sci; 2001 May; 58(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 22061914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part II. Processed pork products.
    Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100383. PubMed ID: 34750079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meat systems produced with Monascus pigment water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsion as pork fat replacers.
    Zheng B; Li X; Hao J; Xu D
    Food Chem; 2023 Feb; 402():134080. PubMed ID: 36137383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in calpain system, desmin degradation and water holding capacity between commercial Meishan and Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire crossbred pork.
    Wang J; Yan XL; Liu R; Fu QQ; Zhou GH; Zhang WG
    Anim Sci J; 2016 Jan; 87(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 25997561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pork primal cuts recognition method via computer vision.
    Huang H; Zhan W; Du Z; Hong S; Dong T; She J; Min C
    Meat Sci; 2022 Oct; 192():108898. PubMed ID: 35792332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. WHCtrend, an up-to-date method to measure water holding capacity in meat.
    Barbera S
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jun; 152():134-140. PubMed ID: 30921624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of oxygen concentration in modified atmosphere packaging on water holding capacity of pork steaks.
    Wang C; Wang H; Li X; Zhang C
    Meat Sci; 2019 Feb; 148():189-197. PubMed ID: 30336963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcriptome profiling analysis of muscle tissue reveals potential candidate genes affecting water holding capacity in Chinese Simmental beef cattle.
    Du L; Chang T; An B; Liang M; Duan X; Cai W; Zhu B; Gao X; Chen Y; Xu L; Zhang L; Li J; Gao H
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11897. PubMed ID: 34099805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: II. Heritabilities and correlations.
    Lo LL; McLaren DG; McKeith FK; Fernando RL; Novakofski J
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2387-96. PubMed ID: 1506302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.