204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36934895)
1. Outcome prediction models incorporating clinical variables for Head and Neck Squamous cell Carcinoma: A systematic review of methodological conduct and risk of bias.
Aly F; Hansen CR; Al Mouiee D; Sundaresan P; Haidar A; Vinod S; Holloway L
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109629. PubMed ID: 36934895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.
Reeve K; On BI; Havla J; Burns J; Gosteli-Peter MA; Alabsawi A; Alayash Z; Götschi A; Seibold H; Mansmann U; Held U
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 9(9):CD013606. PubMed ID: 37681561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kreuzberger N; Damen JA; Trivella M; Estcourt LJ; Aldin A; Umlauff L; Vazquez-Montes MD; Wolff R; Moons KG; Monsef I; Foroutan F; Kreuzer KA; Skoetz N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD012022. PubMed ID: 32735048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Philip MM; Welch A; McKiddie F; Nath M
Cancer Med; 2023 Aug; 12(15):16181-16194. PubMed ID: 37353996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.
Moriarty AS; Meader N; Snell KI; Riley RD; Paton LW; Chew-Graham CA; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Phillips RS; Ali S; McMillan D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013491. PubMed ID: 33956992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.
Wynants L; Van Calster B; Collins GS; Riley RD; Heinze G; Schuit E; Bonten MMJ; Dahly DL; Damen JAA; Debray TPA; de Jong VMT; De Vos M; Dhiman P; Haller MC; Harhay MO; Henckaerts L; Heus P; Kammer M; Kreuzberger N; Lohmann A; Luijken K; Ma J; Martin GP; McLernon DJ; Andaur Navarro CL; Reitsma JB; Sergeant JC; Shi C; Skoetz N; Smits LJM; Snell KIE; Sperrin M; Spijker R; Steyerberg EW; Takada T; Tzoulaki I; van Kuijk SMJ; van Bussel B; van der Horst ICC; van Royen FS; Verbakel JY; Wallisch C; Wilkinson J; Wolff R; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
BMJ; 2020 Apr; 369():m1328. PubMed ID: 32265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic models predicting transition to psychotic disorder using blood-based biomarkers: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
Byrne JF; Mongan D; Murphy J; Healy C; Fӧcking M; Cannon M; Cotter DR
Transl Psychiatry; 2023 Oct; 13(1):333. PubMed ID: 37898606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis.
Lu Z; Zhou X; Fu L; Li Y; Tian T; Liu Q; Zou H
BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e073375. PubMed ID: 37827742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning models for diabetes management in acute care using electronic medical records: A systematic review.
Kamel Rahimi A; Canfell OJ; Chan W; Sly B; Pole JD; Sullivan C; Shrapnel S
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 162():104758. PubMed ID: 35398812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
BMJ; 2021 Oct; 375():n2281. PubMed ID: 34670780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating methodological quality of prognostic prediction models on patient reported outcome measurements after total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: a systematic review protocol.
Chang WJ; Naylor J; Natarajan P; Liu V; Adie S
Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 11(1):165. PubMed ID: 35948989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction models for development of retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation in a Dutch primary care setting.
van der Heijden AA; Nijpels G; Badloe F; Lovejoy HL; Peelen LM; Feenstra TL; Moons KGM; Slieker RC; Herings RMC; Elders PJM; Beulens JW
Diabetologia; 2020 Jun; 63(6):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32246157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reporting and Methods in Developing Prognostic Prediction Models for Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
Zhang H; Shao J; Chen D; Zou P; Cui N; Tang L; Wang D; Ye Z
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes; 2020; 13():4981-4992. PubMed ID: 33364802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review of methodological quality of model development studies predicting prognostic outcome for resectable pancreatic cancer.
Bradley A; Van Der Meer R; McKay CJ
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e027192. PubMed ID: 31439598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic models for patients suffering a heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review.
Jia YY; Cui NQ; Jia TT; Song JP
ESC Heart Fail; 2024 Jun; 11(3):1341-1351. PubMed ID: 38318693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical appraisal of the prognostic predictive models for patients with sepsis: Which model can be applied in clinical practice?
Beneyto-Ripoll C; Palazón-Bru A; Llópez-Espinós P; Martínez-Díaz AM; Gil-Guillén VF; de Los Ángeles Carbonell-Torregrosa M
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Aug; 75(8):e14044. PubMed ID: 33492724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-treatment re-bleeding following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review of published prediction models with risk of bias and clinical applicability assessment.
Dissanayake AS; Ho KM; Phillips TJ; Honeybul S; Hankey GJ
J Clin Neurosci; 2024 Jan; 119():102-111. PubMed ID: 37995407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
