These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36934955)

  • 41. Abortion services in the United States, 1987 and 1988.
    Henshaw SK; Van Vort J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1990; 22(3):102-8, 142. PubMed ID: 2379566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The perspective of Canadian health care professionals on abortion service during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Ennis M; Wahl K; Jeong D; Knight K; Renner R; Munro S; Dunn S; Guilbert E; Norman WV
    Fam Pract; 2021 Aug; 38(Suppl 1):i30-i36. PubMed ID: 34448482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Supported at-home abortion: An exploratory study of methods, outcomes, and motivations of community-led abortion care in the United States and Canada.
    Dutton-Kenny M; Ojanen-Goldsmith A; Dwyer E; Horner D; Prager SW
    Contraception; 2024 Apr; 132():110368. PubMed ID: 38232941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pathways to Abortion at a Tertiary Care Hospital: Examining Obesity and Delays.
    Frarey A; Schreiber C; McAllister A; Shaber A; Sonalkar S; Sammel MD; Long JA
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2019 Mar; 51(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 30645011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Characteristics of abortion service providers in two northern Indian states.
    Creanga AA; Roy P; Tsui AO
    Contraception; 2008 Dec; 78(6):500-6. PubMed ID: 19014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The provision of comprehensive reproductive health services in Los Angeles: a physician's perspective.
    Natavio MF
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Apr; 103(4):596-8. PubMed ID: 23409895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. "I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.
    Raifman S; Ralph L; Biggs MA; Grossman D
    Reprod Health; 2021 May; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 33947413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The costs of accessing abortion in South Africa: women's costs associated with second-trimester abortion services in Western Cape Province.
    Lince-Deroche N; Constant D; Harries J; Blanchard K; Sinanovic E; Grossman D
    Contraception; 2015 Oct; 92(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 26142621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Informed decision making and abortion: crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the first amendment.
    Ahmed A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 25846038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Healthcare costs for abortions performed in ambulatory surgery centers vs office-based settings.
    Leslie DL; Liu G; Jones BS; Roberts SCM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):348.e1-348.e9. PubMed ID: 31629727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina.
    Bryant AG; Speizer IS; Hodgkinson JC; Swiatlo A; Curtis SL; Perreira K
    South Med J; 2018 Jun; 111(6):317-323. PubMed ID: 29863217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States.
    Moseson H; Fix L; Ragosta S; Forsberg H; Hastings J; Stoeffler A; Lunn MR; Flentje A; Capriotti MR; Lubensky ME; Obedin-Maliver J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):376.e1-376.e11. PubMed ID: 32986990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Health facilities readiness to provide comprehensive abortion care and factors associated with client satisfaction in Central Oromia Region, Ethiopia: a multilevel modeling approach.
    Gebremariam FA; Habtewold EM; Degife DT; Geneti HB; Gebrekiros DH
    Reprod Health; 2023 May; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 37170219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Legal barriers to second-trimester abortion provision and public health consequences.
    Jones BS; Weitz TA
    Am J Public Health; 2009 Apr; 99(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 19197087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States.
    Ralph L; Ehrenreich K; Kaller S; Biggs MA
    Reprod Health; 2022 Aug; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 35962384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care.
    Wingo E; Ralph LJ; Kaller S; Biggs MA
    Contraception; 2021 Apr; 103(4):269-275. PubMed ID: 33373612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Violence against abortion increases in US clinics.
    Roberts J
    BMJ; 1994 Aug; 309(6952):429. PubMed ID: 7920122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Preferences for contraceptive counseling and access among abortion patients at an independent clinic in Texas.
    Iyer A; Wallace R; Kindratt TB; Gimpel N
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 May; 105(5):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 34538463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.
    Grossman D; Baum S; Fuentes L; White K; Hopkins K; Stevenson A; Potter JE
    Contraception; 2014 Nov; 90(5):496-501. PubMed ID: 25128413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of Legislation Regulating Abortion in Arizona.
    Williams SG; Roberts S; Kerns JL
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 29631976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.