These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 369381)

  • 1. Direct bonding of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Moser JB; Marshall GW; Green FP
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 369381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The marginal leakage of direct bonding orthodontic adhesives].
    Shimizu H
    Shigaku; 1983 Feb; 70(5):1040-60. PubMed ID: 6371630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscope appearance of the enamel/composite/bracket areas using different methods of surface enamel treatment, composite mix and bracket loading.
    Oliver RG; Howe GS
    Br J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 16(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2522317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indirect bonding of orthodontic attachments.
    Moin K
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Sep; 72(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 19976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effects on the enamel of orthodontic fixation technic. "In vitro" scanning electron microscope study].
    Falcolini G; Bossu M; Serra S; Stellino G
    Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1990; 2(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2144116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Light cured direct bonding--is it necessary to use a primer?
    O'Brien KD; Watts DC; Read MJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 2032563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Crystal Bond System - an improvement in direct bracket fixation?].
    Diedrich P
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1983 Dec; 44(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 6365708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The development of indirect bonding in combination with pre-bonded appliances].
    Altounian G
    Orthod Fr; 1987; 58 Pt 2():775-90. PubMed ID: 3334691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Enamel micro-abrasion].
    Mehdi S; Mano MC; Sorel O; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 19552877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Changes in enamel after removal of direct orthodontic brackets].
    Falcolini G; Bossu M; Siddi Merlini G; Serra S
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 2485805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments.
    Retief DH; Denys FR
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 369407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current note No. 71. The bonding of orthodontic brackets to composite resin surfaces.
    Schwartz RE; Tyas MJ; West VC
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Oct; 35(5):472-3. PubMed ID: 2073197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Cook PA; Luther F; Youngson CC
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The peripheral joint: an unrecognized element in the bonding of orthodontic appliances].
    Palot C; Marzin I; Triconnet L
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():893-8. PubMed ID: 1842256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive.
    Oliver RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Mar; 93(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2964197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bonding of orthodontic brackets. 2: Bonding of brackets using the indirect method].
    Altounian G
    Cah Prothese; 1986 Jun; 14(56):135-64. PubMed ID: 3533231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.
    Zachrisson BU; Brobakken BO
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Jul; 74(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 356618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.