These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36938784)

  • 21. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.
    Fiedler L; Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech.
    Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Wendt D; Alickovic E; Whitmer WM; Lunner T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235782. PubMed ID: 32649733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Previous Mental Load and Incentives Influence Anticipatory Arousal as Indexed by the Baseline Pupil Diameter in a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Alfandari D; Richter M; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Naylor G
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231196520. PubMed ID: 37847850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
    Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recall of Reverberant Speech in Quiet and Four-Talker Babble Noise.
    Koo M; Jeon J; Moon H; Suh MW; Lee JH; Oh SH; Park MK
    Brain Sci; 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34356126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pupillometry reveals differences in cognitive demands of listening to face mask-attenuated speech.
    Carraturo S; McLaughlin DJ; Peelle JE; Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Dec; 154(6):3973-3985. PubMed ID: 38149818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.
    Koelewijn T; de Kluiver H; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effect of Breathy Vocal Quality on Speech Intelligibility and Listening Effort in Background Noise.
    Shen J; Heller Murray E; Kulick ER
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231206925. PubMed ID: 37817666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alpha-Band Dynamics of Hearing Aid Wearers Performing the Repeat-Recall Test (RRT).
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165231222098. PubMed ID: 38549287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pupil Dilation Reflects Perceptual Priorities During a Receptive Speech Task.
    Mechtenberg H; Giorio C; Myers EB
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):425-440. PubMed ID: 37882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of an Australian behavioural method for assessing listening task difficulty at high speech intelligibility levels.
    Carabali CA; Innes-Brown H; Luke R; Riis S; Lunner T; McKay CM
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Feb; 61(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 34106802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Slower Speaking Rate Reduces Listening Effort Among Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Teece KH
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):584-595. PubMed ID: 33002968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.
    Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Vaden KI; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 23157603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A decrease in physiological arousal accompanied by stable behavioral performance reflects task habituation.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Zhang Y; Ng EHN
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():876807. PubMed ID: 35937878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention Mobilization as a Modulator of Listening Effort: Evidence From Pupillometry.
    Johns MA; Calloway RC; Karunathilake IMD; Decruy LP; Anderson S; Simon JZ; Kuchinsky SE
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241245240. PubMed ID: 38613337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using the Repeat-Recall Test to Examine Factors Affecting Context Use.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):771-780. PubMed ID: 33588513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.