These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36938784)

  • 41. Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.
    Wagner AE; Nagels L; Toffanin P; Opie JM; Başkent D
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519845596. PubMed ID: 31131729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Text Captioning Buffers Against the Effects of Background Noise and Hearing Loss on Memory for Speech.
    Payne BR; Silcox JW; Crandell HA; Lash A; Ferguson SH; Lohani M
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 34260436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
    Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Baseline pupil size encodes task-related information and modulates the task-evoked response in a speech-in-noise task.
    Relaño-Iborra H; Wendt D; Neagu MB; Kressner AA; Dau T; Bækgaard P
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221134003. PubMed ID: 36426573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The role of reward and task demand in value-based strategic allocation of auditory comprehension effort.
    Zhang M; Siegle GJ; McNeil MR; Pratt SR; Palmer C
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107775. PubMed ID: 31401432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.
    Winn MB; Edwards JR; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):e153-65. PubMed ID: 25654299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study.
    Borghini G; Hazan V
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():152. PubMed ID: 29593489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Measuring listening-related effort and fatigue in school-aged children using pupillometry.
    McGarrigle R; Dawes P; Stewart AJ; Kuchinsky SE; Munro KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Sep; 161():95-112. PubMed ID: 28505505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Investigating the Influences of Task Demand and Reward on Cardiac Pre-Ejection Period Reactivity During a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Plain B; Richter M; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Bhuiyan T; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):718-731. PubMed ID: 33201048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids.
    Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):615-628. PubMed ID: 33027198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension.
    Wendt D; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():345. PubMed ID: 27014152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.