These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36938802)

  • 21. Concierge care and patient reviews.
    Nemzer LR; Neymotin F
    Health Econ; 2020 Aug; 29(8):913-922. PubMed ID: 32515116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
    Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The majority of negative online otolaryngology reviews are non-clinical.
    Garcia JR; Yu SE; Rohatgi AP; Pollock JR; Naples JG
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2024; 45(4):104335. PubMed ID: 38678800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex, Age, and Patient Experience in Cardiologist Reviews: A Large-Scale Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis.
    Yang A; Rodriguez F; Woo JP
    JACC Adv; 2024 Jul; 3(7):101046. PubMed ID: 39129993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.
    Prabhu AV; Randhawa S; Clump D; Heron DE; Beriwal S
    Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2165. PubMed ID: 29644154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. AI-Assisted Sentiment Analysis of ACFAS Fellowship-Trained Foot and Ankle Surgeon Online Reviews.
    Casciato DJ; Mateen S
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(5):577-579. PubMed ID: 38879146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online Ratings for Vascular Interventional Proceduralists Vary by Physician Specialty.
    Wanken ZJ; Rode JB; Bessen SY; Anderson PB; Barnes JA; Eid MA; Goodney PP
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Jan; 70():27-35. PubMed ID: 32442595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bifurcation of Patient Reviews: An Analysis of Trends in Online Ratings.
    Devgan LL; Klein EJ; Fox S; Ozturk T
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e2781. PubMed ID: 32440443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Dermatologist Ratings on Health Care-Specific and General Consumer Websites.
    Waqas B; Cooley V; Lipner SR
    Cutis; 2021 Apr; 107(4):182-184. PubMed ID: 34096845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Impact of Ambivalent Attitudes on the Helpfulness of Web-Based Reviews: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Large Physician Review Website.
    Dong W; Liu Y; Zhu Z; Cao X
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e38306. PubMed ID: 37247213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Satisfaction in Academic Otolaryngology: Do Physician Demographics Impact Press Ganey Survey Scores?
    Tracy LF; Jabbour N; Rubin BR; Sobin LB; Lawlor CM; Basa KC; Levi JR; Tracy JC
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Aug; 130(8):1902-1906. PubMed ID: 31603572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rating a Sports Medicine Surgeon's "Quality" in the Modern Era: an Analysis of Popular Physician Online Rating Websites.
    Nwachukwu BU; Adjei J; Trehan SK; Chang B; Amoo-Achampong K; Nguyen JT; Taylor SA; McCormick F; Ranawat AS
    HSS J; 2016 Oct; 12(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 27703422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of social media presence, age, and patient reported wait times on physician review websites for sports medicine surgeons.
    Sama AJ; Matichak DP; Schiller NC; Li DJ; Donnally CJ; Damodar D; Cole BJ
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 Oct; 21():101502. PubMed ID: 34350098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.