134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36939567)
41. Early Outcomes With a Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.
McJunkin JL; Durakovic N; Herzog J; Buchman CA
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e28-e33. PubMed ID: 29227449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cone Beam CT Versus Multislice CT: Radiologic Diagnostic Agreement in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implantation.
Razafindranaly V; Truy E; Pialat JB; Martinon A; Bourhis M; Boublay N; Faure F; Ltaïef-Boudrigua A
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1246-54. PubMed ID: 27518208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception.
Lee SY; Kim YS; Jo HD; Kim Y; Carandang M; Huh G; Choi BY
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15135. PubMed ID: 34302030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes.
Sunwoo W; Jeon HW; Choi BY
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22809. PubMed ID: 34815432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Insertion Results of a Mid-scala Electrode Assessed by MRI and CBCT Image Fusion.
Sipari S; Iso-Mustajärvi M; Löppönen H; Dietz A
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e1019-e1025. PubMed ID: 30444847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Intraoperative Measured Electrocochleography and Fluoroscopy Video to Detect Cochlea Trauma.
Greisiger R; Bester C; Sørensen T; Korslund H; Bunne M; O'Leary S; Jablonski GE
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jan; 45(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 38085760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. OPTIMISING THE PARAMETERS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT IMAGING WITH CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Aarnisalo A; Karppi H; Sinkkonen ST; Koivisto J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Apr; 199(5):462-470. PubMed ID: 36789742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Automated Calculation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Parameters in Clinical Cone-Beam CT.
Andersen SAW; Keith JP; Hittle B; Riggs WJ; Adunka O; Wiet GJ; Powell KA
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 34789695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [The application progress of cone beam computed tomography in cochlear implantation].
Xu Z; Lin Y; Cha D
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 35(9):845-849. PubMed ID: 34628843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Radiologic detectability of the cochlear implant electrode fixation clip using cone beam computed tomography.
Helmstaedter V; Bueltmann E; Lenarz T; Teschner M
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):271-275. PubMed ID: 27808006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Evaluation of the electrode position by CBCT following cochlear implantation].
Fan XT; Wang N; Hou LX; Wang Z; Zhang H; Xu AT
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):566-570. PubMed ID: 31434368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The use of cone beam imaging to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones.
Saeed SR; Selvadurai D; Beale T; Murray B; Boyd P; Biggs N; Gibson P; Risi F
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S14-5. PubMed ID: 24533756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. 3D curved multiplanar cone beam CT reconstruction for intracochlear position assessment of straight electrodes array. A temporal bone and clinical study.
De Seta D; Mancini P; Russo FY; Torres R; Mosnier I; Bensimon JL; De Seta E; Heymann D; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Nguyen Y
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2016 Dec; 36(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 27600104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography.
Bevis N; Effertz T; Beutner D; Gueldner C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 May; 278(5):1381-1386. PubMed ID: 32671538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Slim Straight and Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.
MacPhail ME; Connell NT; Totten DJ; Gray MT; Pisoni D; Yates CW; Nelson RF
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 May; 166(5):943-950. PubMed ID: 34399646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Precurved Cochlear Implants and Tip Foldover: A Cadaveric Imaging Study.
Trakimas DR; Kozin ED; Ghanad I; Barber SR; Curtin H; Remenschneider AK
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Feb; 158(2):343-349. PubMed ID: 29086634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography].
Güldner C; Weiss R; Eivazi B; Bien S; Werner JA; Diogo I
HNO; 2012 Sep; 60(9):817-22. PubMed ID: 22767189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.
Zou J; Lähelmä J; Koivisto J; Dhanasingh A; Jolly C; Aarnisalo A; Wolff J; Pyykkö I
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 May; 135(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 25675836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
