These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36939594)

  • 1. Qualitative Assessment of Quality and Readability of Patient-Directed Online Resources for Cochlear Implants in Children.
    Sanad SA; Mokhtar AM; Alharbi MO; Bukhari AF; Zawawi F
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jul; 169(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 36939594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
    Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability and Quality of English and Spanish Online Health Information about Cochlear Implants.
    Nix E; Willgruber A; Rawls C; Kinealy BP; Zeitler D; Schuh M; Bush M
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Mar; 44(3):223-228. PubMed ID: 36728625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.
    Byrne J; Keogh S; Cullinane C; Razzaq Z; Redmond HP
    OTO Open; 2022; 6(4):2473974X221133308. PubMed ID: 36311181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online Patient Information on Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy: An Evaluation of Quality, Suitability, Reliability, Readability, and Content.
    Ang HL; Tan HH; Logie KM; McDonald CF; Khor YH
    Chest; 2022 Feb; 161(2):483-491. PubMed ID: 34390709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
    Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
    Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
    Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
    Vågenes H; Pranić SM
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
    Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
    Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of web-based information on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Singh S; Saini R; Sagar R
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2022 May; 71():103071. PubMed ID: 35303590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.
    Ng MK; Mont MA; Piuzzi NS
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):647-651.e2. PubMed ID: 31678019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
    Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
    Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.