136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36939607)
21. The Diagnostic Significance of the BI-RADS Classification Combined With Automated Breast Volume Scanner and Shear Wave Elastography for Breast Lesions.
Ren T; Li X; Xiang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang M; Zhang C
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jul; 42(7):1459-1469. PubMed ID: 36534583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 23212276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of diagnostic potential of shear wave elastography between breast mass lesions and non-mass-like lesions.
Li J; Liu Y; Li Y; Li S; Wang J; Zhu Y; Lu H
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110609. PubMed ID: 36423364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of shear-wave elastography (SWE) in complex cystic and solid breast lesions in comparison with conventional ultrasound.
Lee BE; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25937525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear-Wave Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pillai A; Voruganti T; Barr R; Langdon J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 May; 19(5):625-634.e0. PubMed ID: 35358483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation.
Bayat M; Denis M; Gregory A; Mehrmohammadi M; Kumar V; Meixner D; Fazzio RT; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172801. PubMed ID: 28257467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: factors associated with false negative and false positive results.
Park SY; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3788-3798. PubMed ID: 28168373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?
Kim SJ; Ko KH; Jung HK; Kim H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct; 94(42):e1540. PubMed ID: 26496257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Additional diagnostic value of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler US for evaluation of breast non-mass lesions detected at B-mode US.
Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Shin JH; Kim GR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3542-9. PubMed ID: 26787603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Multiparametric Shear Wave Elastography Indices in Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
Tekcan Sanli DE; Yildirim D; Kandemirli SG; Sanli AN; Aribal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S50-S61. PubMed ID: 34674923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.
Tian J; Liu Q; Wang X; Xing P; Yang Z; Wu C
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41216. PubMed ID: 28106134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Evaluation of Ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System Category 4 Lesions.
Li XL; Xu HX; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Huang X; Li DD; Guo LH; Xu JM; Sun LP; Fang L; Xu XH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2050-7. PubMed ID: 27174418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastograghy for solid breast mass evaluation.
Cong R; Li J; Guo S
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 87():111-119. PubMed ID: 28065370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of tumor size measurement: comparison of B-mode ultrasound, strain elastography, and 2D and 3D shear wave elastography with histopathological lesion size.
Farrokh A; Maass N; Treu L; Heilmann T; Schäfer FK
Acta Radiol; 2019 Apr; 60(4):451-458. PubMed ID: 30043622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography.
Yang H; Xu Y; Zhao Y; Yin J; Chen Z; Huang P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):930. PubMed ID: 32993571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results?
Yoon JH; Jung HK; Lee JT; Ko KH
Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2432-40. PubMed ID: 23673572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
