These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36941077)
1. Enhancers display constrained sequence flexibility and context-specific modulation of motif function. Reiter F; de Almeida BP; Stark A Genome Res; 2023 Mar; 33(3):346-358. PubMed ID: 36941077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of synthetic enhancers. de Almeida BP; Reiter F; Pagani M; Stark A Nat Genet; 2022 May; 54(5):613-624. PubMed ID: 35551305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of sequence determinants of enhancer function using natural genetic variation. Yang MG; Ling E; Cowley CJ; Greenberg ME; Vierbuchen T Elife; 2022 Aug; 11():. PubMed ID: 36043696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short DNA sequence patterns accurately identify broadly active human enhancers. Colbran LL; Chen L; Capra JA BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 28716036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissection of thousands of cell type-specific enhancers identifies dinucleotide repeat motifs as general enhancer features. Yáñez-Cuna JO; Arnold CD; Stampfel G; Boryń LM; Gerlach D; Rath M; Stark A Genome Res; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1147-56. PubMed ID: 24714811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A machine learning approach for identifying novel cell type-specific transcriptional regulators of myogenesis. Busser BW; Taher L; Kim Y; Tansey T; Bloom MJ; Ovcharenko I; Michelson AM PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(3):e1002531. PubMed ID: 22412381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information content differentiates enhancers from silencers in mouse photoreceptors. Friedman RZ; Granas DM; Myers CA; Corbo JC; Cohen BA; White MA Elife; 2021 Sep; 10():. PubMed ID: 34486522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genome-wide analyses of Shavenbaby target genes reveals distinct features of enhancer organization. Menoret D; Santolini M; Fernandes I; Spokony R; Zanet J; Gonzalez I; Latapie Y; Ferrer P; Rouault H; White KP; Besse P; Hakim V; Aerts S; Payre F; Plaza S Genome Biol; 2013 Aug; 14(8):R86. PubMed ID: 23972280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative-enhancer-FACS-seq (QeFS) reveals epistatic interactions among motifs within transcriptional enhancers in developing Drosophila tissue. Waters CT; Gisselbrecht SS; Sytnikova YA; Cafarelli TM; Hill DE; Bulyk ML Genome Biol; 2021 Dec; 22(1):348. PubMed ID: 34930411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila. Loubiere V; de Almeida BP; Pagani M; Stark A Nat Commun; 2024 Oct; 15(1):8584. PubMed ID: 39362902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Widespread regulatory specificities between transcriptional co-repressors and enhancers in Jacobs J; Pagani M; Wenzl C; Stark A Science; 2023 Jul; 381(6654):198-204. PubMed ID: 37440660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subtle changes in motif positioning cause tissue-specific effects on robustness of an enhancer's activity. Erceg J; Saunders TE; Girardot C; Devos DP; Hufnagel L; Furlong EE PLoS Genet; 2014 Jan; 10(1):e1004060. PubMed ID: 24391522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncoupling evolutionary changes in DNA sequence, transcription factor occupancy and enhancer activity. Khoueiry P; Girardot C; Ciglar L; Peng PC; Gustafson EH; Sinha S; Furlong EE Elife; 2017 Aug; 6():. PubMed ID: 28792889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of developmental genes: molecular microevolution of enhancer sequences at the Ubx locus in Drosophila and its impact on developmental phenotypes. Phinchongsakuldit J; MacArthur S; Brookfield JF Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):348-63. PubMed ID: 14660693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. Ludwig MZ; Patel NH; Kreitman M Development; 1998 Mar; 125(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 9449677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data. He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Measurement and Thermodynamic Modeling of Fused Enhancers Support a Two-Tiered Mechanism for Interpreting Regulatory DNA. Samee MAH; Lydiard-Martin T; Biette KM; Vincent BJ; Bragdon MD; Eckenrode KB; Wunderlich Z; Estrada J; Sinha S; DePace AH Cell Rep; 2017 Oct; 21(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 28978476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Syntax compensates for poor binding sites to encode tissue specificity of developmental enhancers. Farley EK; Olson KM; Zhang W; Rokhsar DS; Levine MS Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(23):6508-13. PubMed ID: 27155014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Role of Chromatin Accessibility in cis-Regulatory Evolution. Peng PC; Khoueiry P; Girardot C; Reddington JP; Garfield DA; Furlong EEM; Sinha S Genome Biol Evol; 2019 Jul; 11(7):1813-1828. PubMed ID: 31114856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]