These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36941469)

  • 1. The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection.
    Verschuere B; Lin CC; Huismann S; Kleinberg B; Willemse M; Mei ECJ; van Goor T; Löwy LHS; Appiah OK; Meijer E
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 May; 7(5):718-728. PubMed ID: 36941469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Veracity judgement, not accuracy: Reconsidering the role of facial expressions, empathy, and emotion recognition training on deception detection.
    Zloteanu M; Bull P; Krumhuber EG; Richardson DC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 May; 74(5):910-927. PubMed ID: 33234008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.
    Gongola J; Scurich N; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 27685642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
    Street CN; Richardson DC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: an exploratory approach.
    Wright Whelan C; Wagstaff GF; Wheatcroft JM
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 25975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Truth, lies, and videotape: an investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception.
    Porter S; Woodworth M; Birt AR
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Dec; 24(6):643-58. PubMed ID: 11105477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting deception in facial expressions of pain: accuracy and training.
    Hill ML; Craig KD
    Clin J Pain; 2004; 20(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 15502685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Being accurate about accuracy in verbal deception detection.
    Kleinberg B; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220228. PubMed ID: 31393894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
    Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting lies in investigative interviews through the analysis of response latencies and error rates to unexpected questions.
    Melis G; Ursino M; Scarpazza C; Zangrossi A; Sartori G
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12268. PubMed ID: 38806588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How humans impair automated deception detection performance.
    Kleinberg B; Verschuere B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103250. PubMed ID: 33450692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A true denial or a false confession? Assessing veracity of suspects' statements using MASAM and SVA.
    Wojciechowski BW; Gräns M; Lidén M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198211. PubMed ID: 29856813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All?
    Ten Brinke L; Vohs KD; Carney DR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 20(8):579-588. PubMed ID: 27353575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.