241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36941864)
1. Impacts of embracing 39-week elective induction across an entire labor and delivery unit.
Jelks AT; Yao AQ; Byrne JD
AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 May; 3(2):100168. PubMed ID: 36941864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is gestational age at term a risk factor for ongoing pregnancies in nulliparous women: A prospective cohort study.
Quibel T; Rozenberg P; Duvillier C; Bouyer C; Bouyer J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Feb; 5(2):100808. PubMed ID: 36371036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in obstetrical practices and pregnancy outcomes following the ARRIVE trial.
Gilroy LC; Al-Kouatly HB; Minkoff HL; McLaren RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 226(5):716.e1-716.e12. PubMed ID: 35139334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timing of cesarean delivery in women with ≥2 previous cesarean deliveries.
Shinar S; Walsh L; Roberts N; Melamed N; Barrett J; Riddell C; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):110.e1-110.e10. PubMed ID: 34363783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based protocol decreases time to vaginal delivery in elective inductions.
Suresh SC; Kucirka L; Chau DB; Hadley M; Sheffield JS
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100294. PubMed ID: 33451623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labor versus expectant management among low-risk patients with one prior cesarean delivery.
Ukoha EP; Wen T; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38852849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor.
Cozzi-Glaser GD; Blanchard CT; Stanford JN; Oben AG; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Subramaniam A; Battarbee AN; Casey BM; Tita AT; Sinkey RG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2024 Dec; 37(1):2295223. PubMed ID: 38124289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
Thuillier C; Roy S; Peyronnet V; Quibel T; Nlandu A; Rozenberg P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 218(3):341.e1-341.e9. PubMed ID: 29291413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].
Sgayer I; Frank Wolf M
Harefuah; 2019 Dec; 158(12):802-806. PubMed ID: 31823535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of fetal growth restriction on latency in the setting of expectant management of preeclampsia.
McKinney D; Boyd H; Langager A; Oswald M; Pfister A; Warshak CR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):395.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26767794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
