These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36942949)

  • 21. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adverse effects of first-degree AV-block in patients with sinus node dysfunction: data from the mode selection trial.
    Holmqvist F; Hellkamp AS; Lee KL; Lamas GA; Daubert JP;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 37(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 24797760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Near elimination of ventricular pacing in SafeR mode compared to DDD modes: a randomized study of 422 patients.
    Davy JM; Hoffmann E; Frey A; Jocham K; Rossi S; Dupuis JM; Frabetti L; Ducloux P; Prades E; Jauvert G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 22309303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction.
    Kim WH; Joung B; Shim J; Park JS; Hwang ES; Pak HN; Kim S; Lee M
    Yonsei Med J; 2010 Nov; 51(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 20879047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicted Need for Atrial and Ventricular Pacing Per Indication Group in Patients With Dual-Chamber Pacemakers.
    Breeman KTN; Dijkshoorn LA; Wilde AAM; Tjong FVY; Knops RE
    Heart Lung Circ; 2023 May; 32(5):629-637. PubMed ID: 36990960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of site and rate of atrial pacing on long-term progression of atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome: Septal Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Evaluation (SAFE) Study.
    Lau CP; Tachapong N; Wang CC; Wang JF; Abe H; Kong CW; Liew R; Shin DG; Padeletti L; Kim YH; Omar R; Jirarojanakorn K; Kim YN; Chen MC; Sriratanasathavorn C; Munawar M; Kam R; Chen JY; Cho YK; Li YG; Wu SL; Bailleul C; Tse HF;
    Circulation; 2013 Aug; 128(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 23868858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Closed loop stimulation reduces the incidence of atrial high-rate episodes compared with conventional rate-adaptive pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunctions.
    Pisanò ECL; Calvi V; Viscusi M; Rapacciuolo A; Lazzari L; Bontempi L; Pelargonio G; Arena G; Caccavo V; Wang CC; Merkely B; Lin LY; Oh IY; Bertaglia E; Saporito D; Menichelli M; Nicosia A; Carretta DM; Coppolino A; Ching CK; Del Castillo ÁM; Su X; Del Maestro M; Giacopelli D; Gargaro A; Botto GL
    Europace; 2024 Jul; 26(7):. PubMed ID: 38938169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of a pacing mode preserving spontaneous AV conduction on ventricular pacing burden and atrial arrhythmias.
    Rey JL; Quenum S; Hero M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 35(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 22339661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Atrioventricular Interval Extension Is Highly Efficient in Preventing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing in Sinus Node Disease: A Randomized Cross-Over Study Versus Dual- to Atrial Single-Chamber Mode Switch.
    Calvi V; Pisanò EC; Brieda M; Melissano D; Castaldi B; Guastaferro C; Nigro G; Madalosso M; Orsida D; Rovai N; Gargaro A; Capucci A
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 May; 3(5):482-490. PubMed ID: 29759604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block.
    Mayumi H; Kohno H; Yasui H; Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Avoidance of ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node disease or intermittent AV block].
    Wiegand UK
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2008 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 18330670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Single-chamber atrial pacing is better than single chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Results of long-term follow up in a prospective randomized study].
    Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Thuesen L; Nielsen TV; Thomsen PE; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Feb; 161(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 9989193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimizing ventricular pacing by a novel atrioventricular (AV) delay hysteresis algorithm in patients with intact or compromised intrinsic AV conduction and different atrial and ventricular lead locations.
    Pakarinen S; Toivonen L
    Ann Med; 2013 Sep; 45(5-6):438-45. PubMed ID: 23768003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction.
    Lamas GA; Lee KL; Sweeney MO; Silverman R; Leon A; Yee R; Marinchak RA; Flaker G; Schron E; Orav EJ; Hellkamp AS; Greer S; McAnulty J; Ellenbogen K; Ehlert F; Freedman RA; Estes NA; Greenspon A; Goldman L;
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Jun; 346(24):1854-62. PubMed ID: 12063369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Atrial pacing site and atrioventricular conduction in patients paced for sinus node disease.
    Watabe T; Abe H; Kohno R; Oginosawa Y; Hayashi K; Ohe H; Tamura M; Takeuchi M; Otsuji Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1224-31. PubMed ID: 24946835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of AV conduction disorders on SafeR mode performance.
    Thibault B; Simpson C; Gagné CE; Blier L; Senaratne M; McNicoll S; Stuglin C; Williams R; Pinter A; Khaykin Y; Nitzsche R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S231-5. PubMed ID: 19250103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of pacing algorithms to avoid unnecessary ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus node syndrome: a single-centre, observational, parallel study.
    Poghosyan HR; Jamalyan SV
    Europace; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1483-9. PubMed ID: 22628453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective Management of Atrioventricular Interval for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation That Developed After DDDR Pacemaker Implantation in a Sick Sinus Syndrome Patient.
    Tasaki H; Ashizawa N; Nagao S; Fukushima K; Furukawa R; Fukae S; Maemura K
    Int Heart J; 2015; 56(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 26370366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
    Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.