These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3694305)

  • 1. The dynamic nature of sensitivity and specificity.
    Lofgren RP
    J Gen Intern Med; 1987; 2(6):452-3. PubMed ID: 3694305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections.
    Judson FN; Ehret J
    Pediatr Ann; 1994 Jul; 23(7):361-9. PubMed ID: 7970900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Normal value, predictive value and panic value. Functional analysis of laboratory tests (author's transl)].
    Okamura K
    Rinsho Byori; 1980; 28(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 6248667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness.
    Baldessarini RJ; Finklestein S; Arana GW
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1983 May; 40(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 6838334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical biostatistics XXXI. On the sensitivity, specificity, and discrimination of diagnostic tests.
    Feinstein AR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1975 Jan; 17(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 1122664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computers in paediatrics. 18. Medical decision making: computer program to calculate sensitivity, specificity, false positive and negative rates, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of a diagnostic test.
    Yip WC; Tay JS; Ho TF; Wong HB
    J Singapore Paediatr Soc; 1986; 28(1-2):74-8. PubMed ID: 3531721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assessment of smear microscopy by stratified lot sampling of treatment follow-up slides.
    Otero L; Van Deun A; Agapito J; Ugaz R; Prellwitz G; Gotuzzo E; Van der Stuyft P
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2011 Feb; 15(2):211-6, i. PubMed ID: 21219683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of diagnostic tests].
    Toman K
    Bull Int Union Tuberc; 1981; 56(1-2):19-30. PubMed ID: 7296087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
    Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
    Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Diagnostic likelihood ratios].
    Capron L
    Rev Prat; 2000 Nov; 50(17):1865-9. PubMed ID: 11151325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why are clinical laboratory tests performed? When are they valid?
    Krieg AF; Gambino R; Galen RS
    JAMA; 1975 Jul; 233(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1173430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical application of review criteria for complete blood analysis].
    Jiang H; Zeng TT; Huang JB; Mao ZG; Zeng SG
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 90(22):1522-5. PubMed ID: 20973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of oral contraceptives on the results of laboratory tests.
    Miale JB; Kent JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Sep; 120(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 4607186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating diagnostic tests in dentistry.
    Douglass CW
    J Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 72(8):1170. PubMed ID: 8360357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A new concept and method of standardizing predictive value].
    Shen H; Chen Q
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Dec; 15(6):360-2. PubMed ID: 7874707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of diagnostic tests].
    Rümke CL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1983 Mar; 127(13):556-61. PubMed ID: 6843704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic program of quality control in clinical microbiology.
    Glasser L; Bosley GS; Boring JR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1971 Sep; 56(3):379-83. PubMed ID: 4937606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immunocytochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors on 219 fine-needle aspirates of breast cancer. A prospective study.
    Marrazzo A; Taormina P; Leonardi P; Lupo F; Filosto S
    Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 7763033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations on 'false negative' and 'false positive' rates.
    Fogerson B
    J Anal Toxicol; 1990; 14(6):388. PubMed ID: 2087102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External quality assurance for the laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease in Ghana.
    Bretzel G; Siegmund V; Nitschke J; Herbinger KH; Thompson R; Fleischmann E; Fleischer B; Adjei O
    Trop Med Int Health; 2006 Nov; 11(11):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17054748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.