165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36943173)
1. A current assessment of the THOR 50M in rear impacts.
White SD; Salmon JL; Prasad P; Burnett RA; Kim A; Buckman J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):208-212. PubMed ID: 36943173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occupant kinematics of the Hybrid III, THOR-M, and postmortem human surrogates under various restraint conditions in full-scale frontal sled tests.
Albert DL; Beeman SM; Kemper AR
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S50-S58. PubMed ID: 29584475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative biofidelity of the Hybrid III and THOR 50th male ATDs under three restraint conditions during frontal sled tests.
Albert DL; Beeman SM; Kemper AR
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S41-S46. PubMed ID: 37267018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Hybrid III and THOR-M neck kinetics and injury risk under various restraint conditions during full-scale frontal sled tests.
Albert DL; Beeman SM; Kemper AR
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S40-S47. PubMed ID: 30543308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal biofidelity assessment of 5th percentile female ATD responses relative to recently developed belt and bar loading corridors.
Ramachandra R; Stammen J; Kang YS; Hutter E; Watkins L; Moorhouse K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S16-S22. PubMed ID: 37267003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sagittal plane moment responses of the THOR-05F anthropomorphic test device.
Humm JR; Yoganandan N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S155-S158. PubMed ID: 34686084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the internal and external biofidelity of current rear impact ATDs to response targets developed from moderate-speed rear impacts of PMHS.
Moorhouse K; Donnelly B; Kang YS; Bolte JH; Herriott R
Stapp Car Crash J; 2012 Oct; 56():171-229. PubMed ID: 23625562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biofidelity Assessment of the WIAMan Thorax by a Comparative Study With Hybrid III, THOR, and PMHS in Frontal Sled Testing.
Zeng W; McMahon J; Shedd DF; Carpenter R; Salzar RS
J Biomech Eng; 2023 Jul; 145(7):. PubMed ID: 36942923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pretensioner loading to rear-seat occupants during static and dynamic testing.
Bohman K; Fredriksson R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S111-8. PubMed ID: 25307375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
Viano DC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occupant Kinematics in Laboratory Rollover Tests: ATD Response and Biofidelity.
Zhang Q; Lessley DL; Riley P; Toczyski J; Lockerby J; Foltz P; Overby B; Seppi J; Crandall JR; Kerrigan JR
Stapp Car Crash J; 2014 Nov; 58():317-60. PubMed ID: 26192959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of seatback deformation on out-of-position front-seat occupants in severe rear impacts.
Burnett RA; Parenteau CS; White SD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):184-188. PubMed ID: 36441165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Thoracic Response and Injury Risk Using the Hybrid III, THOR-M, and Post-Mortem Human Surrogates under Various Restraint Conditions in Full-Scale Frontal Sled Tests.
Albert DL; Beeman SM; Kemper AR
Stapp Car Crash J; 2018 Nov; 62():1-65. PubMed ID: 30608992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion sequence criteria for favorable occupant kinematics in rear impacts.
Viano DC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):189-195. PubMed ID: 36305804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.
Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of head and neck restraint test repeatability for specification improvement.
Patalak JP; Harper MG; Stitzel JD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(6):588-594. PubMed ID: 31329480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of center-mounted airbag in far-side impacts based on THOR sled tests.
Umale S; Hauschild H; Humm J; Driesslein K; Yoganandan N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):726-731. PubMed ID: 31567026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
