These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36943657)

  • 1. Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes.
    Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Huseynov E; Mustafayev TZ; Kayku V; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 36943657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.
    Mirza MB; Gamboa AC; Irlmeier R; Hopkins B; Regenbogen SE; Hrebinko KA; Holder-Murray J; Wiseman JT; Ejaz A; Wise PE; Ye F; Idrees K; Hawkins AT; Balch GC; Khan A
    J Surg Res; 2024 Aug; 300():494-502. PubMed ID: 38875948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancer.
    Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Shadmanov N; Guven K; Bakır B; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    Updates Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(8):2201-2209. PubMed ID: 37955804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sphincter-Saving Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision Provides Better Mesorectal Specimen and Good Oncological Local Control Compared with Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Mid-Low Rectal Cancer.
    Aliyev V; Goksel S; Bakir B; Guven K; Asoglu O
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():160-166. PubMed ID: 33537982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transanal down-to-up dissection of the distal rectum as a viable approach to achieve total mesorectal excision in laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer near the anus: a study of short- and long-term outcomes of 123 consecutive patients from a single Japanese institution.
    Kagami S; Funahashi K; Koda T; Ushigome T; Kaneko T; Suzuki T; Miura Y; Nagashima Y; Yoshida K; Kurihara A
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Nov; 20(1):363. PubMed ID: 36376924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Serin KR; Gultekin FA; Batman B; Ay S; Kapran Y; Saglam S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 26531198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a retrospective study of 672 patients.
    Shadmanov N; Aliyev V; Piozzi GN; Bakır B; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):144. PubMed ID: 38554211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
    Aliyev V; Tokmak H; Goksel S; Meric S; Acar S; Kaya H; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 31811567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-centre cohort study.
    Angehrn FV; Schneider R; Wilhelm A; Daume D; Koechlin L; Fourie L; von Flüe M; Kern B; Steinemann DC; Bolli M
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 35000106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic-Assisted Surgery Improves the Quality of Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Compared to Laparoscopy: Results of a Case-Controlled Analysis.
    Allemann P; Duvoisin C; Di Mare L; Hübner M; Demartines N; Hahnloser D
    World J Surg; 2016 Apr; 40(4):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26552907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
    Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.
    Seow W; Dudi-Venkata NN; Bedrikovetski S; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 May; 27(5):345-360. PubMed ID: 36508067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.