277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36944866)
1. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q.
Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; De Bernardis R; Loria FS; Petrucci V; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1291-1299. PubMed ID: 36944866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Unilateral and Bilateral Mastectomy: Cross-Sectional Study of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life with BREAST-Q.
Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 35927501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A descriptive comparison of satisfaction and well-being between expander-based and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Riggio E; Alfieri S; Toffoli E; Borreani C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 36018329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.
Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Implant Placement.
Manrique OJ; Kapoor T; Banuelos J; Jacobson SR; Martinez-Jorge J; Nguyen MT; Tran NV; Harless CA; Degnim AC; Jakub JW
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Apr; 84(4):361-365. PubMed ID: 31633546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Alcon A; Rosser M; Gedallovich J; Foster RD; Sbitany H; Piper ML
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 36723619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact on Patient's Appearance Perception of Autologous and Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy Using BREAST-Q.
Persichetti P; Barone M; Salzillo R; Cogliandro A; Brunetti B; Ciarrocchi S; Alessandri Bonetti M; Tenna S; Sorotos M; Santanelli Di Pompeo F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1153-1163. PubMed ID: 35229192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of BREAST-Q Scores between Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Le NK; Persing S; Dinis J; Gabrick KS; Wu RT; Sinnott CJ; Avraham T; Young AO; Alperovich M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):708e-714e. PubMed ID: 34705769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.
Nelson JA; Shamsunder MG; Vorstenbosch J; Polanco TO; Matros E; Coriddi MR; Mehrara BJ; Allen RJ; Dayan JH; Disa JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):607e-616e. PubMed ID: 35103644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Hook Shape" Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series.
Marcasciano M; Torto FL; Codolini L; Kaciulyte J; Luridiana G; Cassetti D; Barellini L; Neri A; Ribuffo D; Greco M; Casella D
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 47(2):546-556. PubMed ID: 36280606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of Breast Animation Deformity in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Selective Nerve Ablation.
Eck DL; Nguyen DC; Barnes LL; Jansen DA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1472-1475. PubMed ID: 29959495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.
Sgarzani R; Pasquali S; Buggi F; Tognali D; Marongiu F; Mingozzi M; Melandri D; Morselli PG; Curcio A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 33078212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis.
Li S; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Xu B; Li Z; Qi J; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):890-898. PubMed ID: 31139912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pure Autologous Dermal Graft and Dermal Flap Pocket in Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction After Skin-Reducing Mastectomy: A One-Stage Autologous Reconstruction Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices.
Castagnetti F; Coiro S; Foroni M; Falco G; Mele S; Cenini E; Begnini E; Borgonovo G; Ferrari G
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(4):1679-1685. PubMed ID: 35138424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying the Impact of Prepectoral Implant Conversion on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life.
Seitz AJ; MacKenzie EL; Edalatpour A; Janssen DA; Doubek WG; Afifi AM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 May; 153(5):884e-894e. PubMed ID: 37335561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
