These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3694487)

  • 1. Bioassay techniques for evaluating the possible carcinogenicity of adsorber effluents.
    Bull RJ; Pereira MA; Blackburn KL
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1987; 7(7-8):403-16. PubMed ID: 3694487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Academy of Sciences report--an evaluation of activated carbon for drinking water treatment.
    Suffet IH
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1987; 7(7-8):9-32. PubMed ID: 3320338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mutagenic effects of organic compounds in drinking water.
    Loper JC
    Mutat Res; 1980 Nov; 76(3):241-68. PubMed ID: 7010128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of biological safety index in two Japanese watersheds using a bioassay battery.
    Wei D; Lin Z; Kameya T; Urano K; Du Y
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jul; 72(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 18534658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of the evidence regarding the carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium in drinking water.
    Sedman RM; Beaumont J; McDonald TA; Reynolds S; Krowech G; Howd R
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2006 Apr; 24(1):155-82. PubMed ID: 16690539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation issues for the use of transgenic mouse mutation assays in risk assessment.
    Gorelick NJ
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1996; 395():81-108. PubMed ID: 8895985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments and perspective on the EPA workshop on "The relationship between short-term test information and carcinogenicity".
    Kier LD
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1988; 11(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 2892675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criteria for evidence of chemical carcinogenicity. Interdisciplinary Panel on Carcinogenicity.
    Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4663):682-7. PubMed ID: 6463646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graywater use still a gray area.
    Noah M
    J Environ Health; 2002 Jun; 64(10):22-5. PubMed ID: 12049001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of public health aspects of carcinogenic/mutagenic biorefractories in drinking water.
    Kraybill HF
    Prev Med; 1980 Mar; 9(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 7383987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and operational experiences with activated carbon adsorbers: treatment of Delaware River water, US.
    Cairo PR; Suffet IH
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1987; 7(7-8):289-317. PubMed ID: 3694479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current status of the Gene-Tox Program.
    Auletta AE; Kier LD; Mitchell AD
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():273-81. PubMed ID: 2371300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of drinking water: a comparison between two different concentration methods.
    Buschini A; Giordani F; Pellacani C; Rossi C; Poli P
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):1999-2006. PubMed ID: 18199468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of wastewater effluents for soil aquifer treatment in South Korea.
    Cha W; Choi H; Kim J; Kim IS
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 15344807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US experience with granular activated carbon adsorption.
    Moser RH
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1987; 7(7-8):33-53. PubMed ID: 3694481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of noncancer risk assessment approaches for use in deriving drinking water criteria.
    Gibson MC; deMonsabert SM; Orme-Zavaleta J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Dec; 26(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 9441915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic toxicology at the crossroads--a personal view on the deployment of short-term tests for predicting carcinogenicity.
    Bridges BA
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):25-31. PubMed ID: 3367919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel plant bioassays for monitoring the genotoxicity of drinking water from the inhabited areas of the Ukraine affected by the Chernobyl accident.
    Kovalchuk O; Telyuk P; Kovalchuk L; Kovalchuk I; Titov V
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2003 May; 70(5):847-53. PubMed ID: 12719806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer risk assessment: importance of identifying mechanisms of action.
    Bull RJ
    J Am Water Works Assoc; 1990 Oct; 82(10):57-60. PubMed ID: 11538297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The combined bacterial Lux-Fluoro test for the detection and quantification of genotoxic and cytotoxic agents in surface water: results from the "Technical Workshop on Genotoxicity Biosensing".
    Baumstark-Khan C; Rabbow E; Rettberg P; Horneck G
    Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 17936920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.