193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36945000)
1. Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology.
Gong LP; Li XY; Wu YN; Dong S; Zhang S; Feng YN; Lv YE; Guo XJ; Peng YQ; Du XS; Tian JW; Sun CX; Sun LT
J Ovarian Res; 2023 Mar; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 36945000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses.
Cao L; Wei M; Liu Y; Fu J; Zhang H; Huang J; Pei X; Zhou J
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 33966893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.
Chen GY; Hsu TF; Chan IS; Liu CH; Chao WT; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang PH; Chen YJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7854-7864. PubMed ID: 35583711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External Validation of O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System.
Hack K; Gandhi N; Bouchard-Fortier G; Chawla TP; Ferguson SE; Li S; Kahn D; Tyrrell PN; Glanc P
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 35438559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of an ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for predicting the malignant risk of ovarian tumours.
Du Y; Xiao Y; Guo W; Yao J; Lan T; Li S; Wen H; Zhu W; He G; Zheng H; Chen H
Biomed Eng Online; 2024 Apr; 23(1):41. PubMed ID: 38594729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting Breast Cancer in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Ultrasound Category 4 or 5 Lesions: A Nomogram Combining Radiomics and BI-RADS.
Luo WQ; Huang QX; Huang XW; Hu HT; Zeng FQ; Wang W
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11921. PubMed ID: 31417138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Combing O-RADS US and CA-125 Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Adnexal Malignancy Risk in Women With Different Menopausal Status?
Wu M; Wang Q; Zhang M; Cao J; Chen Y; Zheng J; Luo L; Su M; Lin X; Kuang X; Zhang X
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 35880406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to improve O-RADS MRI score for rating adnexal masses with cystic component?
Assouline V; Dabi Y; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Stojanovic S; Millet I; Reinhold C; Bazot M; Thomassin-Naggara I;
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):5943-5953. PubMed ID: 35332409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Hottat NA; Badr DA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):158-170. PubMed ID: 34797013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel diagnostic nomogram based on serological and ultrasound findings for preoperative prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses.
Guo Y; Jiang T; Ouyang L; Li X; He W; Zhang Z; Shen H; You Z; Yang G; Lai H
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):704-712. PubMed ID: 33357959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound image-based nomogram combining clinical, radiomics, and deep transfer learning features for automatic classification of ovarian masses according to O-RADS.
Liu L; Cai W; Tian H; Wu B; Zhang J; Wang T; Hao Y; Yue G
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1377489. PubMed ID: 38812784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and ADNEX for Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: An External Validation Study Conducted by Junior Sonologists.
Lai HW; Lyu GR; Kang Z; Li LY; Zhang Y; Huang YJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 34549454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
