BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36945008)

  • 1. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Jin Z; Zhu K; Sun J; Zhang J; Zhang B
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 36945008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ma S; Yan T; Liu D; Wang K; Wang J; Song J; Wang T; He W; Bai J; Jin L; Chen X
    Thorac Cancer; 2018 Feb; 9(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 29319236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
    Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments.
    Chen D; Wang W; Mo J; Ren Q; Miao H; Chen Y; Wen Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):145. PubMed ID: 33563244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and safety of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a retrospective study.
    Liu G; Han Y; Peng L; Wang K; Fan Y
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 May; 14(1):97. PubMed ID: 31138245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Open Esophagectomy.
    Gottlieb-Vedi E; Kauppila JH; Mattsson F; Lindblad M; Nilsson M; Lagergren P; Rouvelas I; Lagergren J;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e744-e748. PubMed ID: 33480612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis.
    Pu S; Chen H; Zhou C; Yu S; Liao X; Zhu L; He J; Wang B
    J Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 257():554-571. PubMed ID: 32927322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy is a valuable approach for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
    Ma J; Wang W; Zhang B; Li X; Wu J; Wu Z
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Jan; 46(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 33678638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
    Takahashi M; Toyama H; Takahashi K; Kaiho Y; Ejima Y; Yamauchi M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 38238681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.