These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36945557)

  • 1. Identifying and overcoming the sampling challenges in relative binding free energy calculations of a model protein:protein complex.
    Zhang I; Rufa DA; Pulido I; Henry MM; Rosen LE; Hauser K; Singh S; Chodera JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 36945557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying and Overcoming the Sampling Challenges in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations of a Model Protein:Protein Complex.
    Zhang I; Rufa DA; Pulido I; Henry MM; Rosen LE; Hauser K; Singh S; Chodera JD
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):4863-4882. PubMed ID: 37450482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and Precision of Alchemical Relative Free Energy Predictions with and without Replica-Exchange.
    Wan S; Tresadern G; Pérez-Benito L; van Vlijmen H; Coveney PV
    Adv Theory Simul; 2020 Jan; 3(1):1900195. PubMed ID: 34527855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large Scale Study of Ligand-Protein Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations: Actionable Predictions from Statistically Robust Protocols.
    Bhati AP; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Apr; 18(4):2687-2702. PubMed ID: 35293737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanded Ensemble Methods Can be Used to Accurately Predict Protein-Ligand Relative Binding Free Energies.
    Zhang S; Hahn DF; Shirts MR; Voelz VA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6536-6547. PubMed ID: 34516130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perturbation Free-Energy Toolkit: An Automated Alchemical Topology Builder.
    Petrov D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Sep; 61(9):4382-4390. PubMed ID: 34415755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.
    Huai Z; Yang H; Li X; Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 33037549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the Effectiveness of Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Mondal D; Florian J; Warshel A
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 Oct; 123(42):8910-8915. PubMed ID: 31560539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.
    Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does Hamiltonian Replica Exchange via Lambda-Hopping Enhance the Sampling in Alchemical Free Energy Calculations?
    Procacci P
    Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.
    Lee TS; Allen BK; Giese TJ; Guo Z; Li P; Lin C; McGee TD; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Tao Y; Tsai HC; Xu H; Sherman W; York DM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5595-5623. PubMed ID: 32936637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alchemical Metadynamics: Adding Alchemical Variables to Metadynamics to Enhance Sampling in Free Energy Calculations.
    Hsu WT; Piomponi V; Merz PT; Bussi G; Shirts MR
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Mar; 19(6):1805-1817. PubMed ID: 36853624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations.
    Abel R; Wang L; Harder ED; Berne BJ; Friesner RA
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Jul; 50(7):1625-1632. PubMed ID: 28677954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ensemble-Based Replica Exchange Alchemical Free Energy Methods: The Effect of Protein Mutations on Inhibitor Binding.
    Bhati AP; Wan S; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Feb; 15(2):1265-1277. PubMed ID: 30592603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tinker-OpenMM: Absolute and relative alchemical free energies using AMOEBA on GPUs.
    Harger M; Li D; Wang Z; Dalby K; Lagardère L; Piquemal JP; Ponder J; Ren P
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Sep; 38(23):2047-2055. PubMed ID: 28600826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computing Alchemical Free Energy Differences with Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics (H-REMD) Simulations.
    Meng Y; Dashti DS; Roitberg AE
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Sep; 7(9):2721-2727. PubMed ID: 22125475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PyAutoFEP: An Automated Free Energy Perturbation Workflow for GROMACS Integrating Enhanced Sampling Methods.
    Carvalho Martins L; Cino EA; Ferreira RS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jul; 17(7):4262-4273. PubMed ID: 34142828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Configurational preferences of arylamide α-helix mimetics via alchemical free energy calculations of relative binding affinities.
    Fuller JC; Jackson RM; Shirts MR
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Sep; 116(35):10856-69. PubMed ID: 22920218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.