233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36946417)
21. Motor unit tracking using blind source separation filters and waveform cross-correlations: reliability under physiological and pharmacological conditions.
Goodlich BI; Del Vecchio A; Kavanagh JJ
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2023 Aug; 135(2):362-374. PubMed ID: 37410901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mechanomyographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation from biceps brachii and during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on extensor carpi radialis.
Reza MF; Ikoma K; Chuma T; Mano Y
J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Dec; 149(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16026847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effects of local forearm heating and cooling on motor unit properties during submaximal contractions.
Mallette MM; Cheung SS; Kumar RI; Hodges GJ; Holmes MWR; Gabriel DA
Exp Physiol; 2021 Jan; 106(1):200-211. PubMed ID: 31912952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement of voluntary activation of the back muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Lagan J; Lang P; Strutton PH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2839-45. PubMed ID: 18976953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic stimulation-induced modulations of motor unit firings extracted from multi-channel surface EMG.
Kleine BU; Blok JH; Oostenveld R; Praamstra P; Stegeman DF
Muscle Nerve; 2000 Jul; 23(7):1005-15. PubMed ID: 10882994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity affects exercise-induced changes in corticomotoneuronal excitability and inhibition and voluntary activation.
Bachasson D; Temesi J; Gruet M; Yokoyama K; Rupp T; Millet GY; Verges S
Neuroscience; 2016 Feb; 314():125-33. PubMed ID: 26642805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation.
Darling WG; Wolf SL; Butler AJ
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 174(2):376-85. PubMed ID: 16636787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reductions in motoneuron excitability during sustained isometric contractions are dependent on stimulus and contraction intensity.
Brownstein CG; Espeit L; Royer N; Ansdell P; Škarabot J; Souron R; Lapole T; Millet GY
J Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 125(5):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 33788627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Simulation of electromyographic recordings following transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Moezzi B; Schaworonkow N; Plogmacher L; Goldsworthy MR; Hordacre B; McDonnell MD; Iannella N; Ridding MC; Triesch J
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Nov; 120(5):2532-2541. PubMed ID: 29975165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Selectivity of conventional electrodes for recording motor evoked potentials: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography.
Gallina A; Peters S; Neva JL; Boyd LA; Garland SJ
Muscle Nerve; 2017 Jun; 55(6):828-834. PubMed ID: 27649483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Voluntary activation of ankle muscles is accompanied by subcortical facilitation of their antagonists.
Geertsen SS; Zuur AT; Nielsen JB
J Physiol; 2010 Jul; 588(Pt 13):2391-402. PubMed ID: 20457734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Antagonism of 5-HT
Goodlich BI; Pearcey GEP; Del Vecchio A; Horan SA; Kavanagh JJ
J Physiol; 2024 Apr; 602(8):1759-1774. PubMed ID: 38502567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of remote muscle contraction on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and silent periods in humans.
Tazoe T; Sakamoto M; Nakajima T; Endoh T; Komiyama T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 17449319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Kojima S; Onishi H; Sugawara K; Kirimoto H; Suzuki M; Tamaki H
BMC Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 14():43. PubMed ID: 23547559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Motor unit distribution and recruitment in spastic and non-spastic bilateral biceps brachii muscles of chronic stroke survivors.
Liu Y; Chen YT; Zhang C; Zhou P; Li S; Zhang Y
J Neural Eng; 2022 Aug; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35926440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Motor unit recruitment and rate coding in response to fatiguing shoulder abductions and subsequent recovery.
Jensen BR; Pilegaard M; Sjøgaard G
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 Oct; 83(2-3):190-9. PubMed ID: 11104060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities.
Schaworonkow N; Triesch J; Ziemann U; Zrenner C
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 30268710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Modulation of Motor Evoked Potentials via the Cutaneous Silent Period within Proximal-Distal Muscles in the Upper-Limb.
Eckert NR; Greenwell D; Poston B; Riley ZA
Neuroscience; 2022 Jul; 495():15-24. PubMed ID: 35623480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reliability of diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Welch JF; Argento PJ; Mitchell GS; Fox EJ
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2020 Dec; 129(6):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 33031020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Physiological processes influencing motor-evoked potential duration with voluntary contraction.
van den Bos MA; Geevasinga N; Menon P; Burke D; Kiernan MC; Vucic S
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1156-1162. PubMed ID: 28031404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
