These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36946770)
1. Retrospective Review of the Laser Removal of Facial Cosmetic Tattoos. Hartman N; Loyal J; Borsack S; Goldman MP; Boen M Dermatol Surg; 2023 Jun; 49(6):559-565. PubMed ID: 36946770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of picosecond versus nanosecond Nd:YAG lasers for the removal of cosmetic tattoos in an animal model. Leu FJ; Huang CL; Wu YS; Wang CC Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(2):1343-1350. PubMed ID: 34410571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lasers for the treatment of eyebrow microblading and cosmetic tattoo pigment: a review of the literature. Geisler AN; Eber A; Kim K; Arndt KA Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Nov; 38(1):256. PubMed ID: 37932517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in tattoo removal: A systematic review. Gurnani P; Williams N; Al-Hetheli G; Chukwuma O; Roth R; Fajardo F; Nouri K J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Jul; 87(1):103-109. PubMed ID: 32763326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of 1064-nm picosecond laser alone and in combination with fractional 1064-nm picosecond laser in tattoo removal. Sirithanabadeekul P; Vongchansathapat P; Sutthipisal N; Thanasarnaksorn W; Suwanchinda A J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Jul; 21(7):2832-2839. PubMed ID: 35488471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laser removal of tattoos. Kuperman-Beade M; Levine VJ; Ashinoff R Am J Clin Dermatol; 2001; 2(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11702617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Eyebrow Tattoos in Fitzpatrick III-IV With Picosecond (1,064, 532-nm) Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser With a Perfluorodecalin-Infused Patch: A Pilot Study. Moustafa F; Suggs A; Hamill SS; Friedman PM Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Sep; 52(7):586-589. PubMed ID: 31828826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New and Advanced Picosecond Lasers for Tattoo Removal. Adatto MA; Amir R; Bhawalkar J; Sierra R; Bankowski R; Rozen D; Dierickx C; Lapidoth M Curr Probl Dermatol; 2017; 52():113-123. PubMed ID: 28288459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and Efficacy of Tattoo Removal Using a Dual-Wavelength 1064/532-nm Picosecond Laser in Patients With Fitzpatrick Skin Type III and IV. Nguyen HT; Doan EVL; Tran TNA; Vu TTP; Phan HN; Sobanko JF Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Sep; 53(7):939-945. PubMed ID: 33027538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of 1064 nm nanosecond, 1064 nm picosecond, 755 nm, and 595 nm lasers for tattoo removal: An essential role by macrophage. Du XJ; Zhou HM; Wang Z; Liu J; Wang JF; Li D; Wu TT; Chen B; Zeng WH Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Jul; 54(5):737-746. PubMed ID: 35289435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficacy and the adverse reactions of laser-assisted tattoo removal - a prospective split study using nanosecond and picosecond lasers. Bäumler W; Breu C; Philipp B; Haslböck B; Berneburg M; Weiß KT J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 34543473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]