345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36947180)
1. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis.
Li S; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Xu B; Li Z; Qi J; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):890-898. PubMed ID: 31139912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.
Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on the Outcomes of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Awadeen A; Fareed M; Elameen AM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 35879475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Sinnott CJ; Pronovost MT; Persing SM; Wu R; Young AO
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 33833185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Meta-analysis of Postoperative Complications of Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Zhao X; Wu X; Dong J; Liu Y; Zheng L; Zhang L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):892-901. PubMed ID: 26377821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Capsular Contracture of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Arm Meta-analysis.
Liu J; Hou J; Li Z; Wang B; Sun J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Jun; 44(3):735-742. PubMed ID: 31919627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.
Nealon KP; Weitzman RE; Sobti N; Gadd M; Specht M; Jimenez RB; Ehrlichman R; Faulkner HR; Austen WG; Liao EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):898e-908e. PubMed ID: 32332523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Montorfano L; Hung YC; Chaker S; Saad M; Kalmar CL; Ferri F; Higdon KK; Perdikis G
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 36975095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prepectoral single-stage breast reconstruction.
Liu J; Zheng X; Lin S; Han H; Xu C
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):5659-5668. PubMed ID: 35182228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications After Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhang X; Ning S; Zhang Y
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38700543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complete Implant Wrapping with Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study.
Bassetto F; Pandis L; Azzena GP; De Antoni E; Crema A; Scortecci L; Brambullo T; Pavan C; Marini M; Facchin F; Vindigni V
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(4):1575-1584. PubMed ID: 35352159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The First Use of Human-Derived ADM in Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction after Skin-Reducing Mastectomy.
Marongiu F; Bertozzi N; Sibilio A; Tognali D; Mingozzi M; Curcio A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Oct; 45(5):2048-2057. PubMed ID: 33782725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction is not associated with high complication rate as before: a Meta-analysis.
Xie J; Wang M; Cao Y; Zhu Z; Ruan S; Ou M; Yu P; Shi J
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2023; 57(1-6):7-15. PubMed ID: 34581645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
