138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36947205)
1. Diagnostic performance of the "drooping" sign in CT diagnosis of exophytic renal angiomyolipoma.
Shen L; Nawaz R; Tse JR; Negrete LM; Lubner MG; Toia GV; Liang T; Wentland AL; Kamaya A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jun; 48(6):2091-2101. PubMed ID: 36947205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphologic analysis with computed tomography may help differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 602 patients.
Kim YH; Han K; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Park SY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):647-654. PubMed ID: 28677004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are growth patterns on MRI in small (< 4 cm) solid renal masses useful for predicting benign histology?
Lim RS; McInnes MDF; Siddaiah M; Flood TA; Lavallee LT; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3115-3124. PubMed ID: 29492598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinguishing lipid-poor angiomyolipoma from renal carcinoma using tumor shape.
Strother M; Uzzo RN; Handorf E; Uzzo RG
Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 41(4):208.e9-208.e14. PubMed ID: 36801192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of signal loss in in-phase gradient-echo images for differentiation between small renal cell carcinoma and lipid-poor angiomyolipomas.
Lima FVA; Elias J; Chahud F; Reis RB; Muglia VF
Br J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 93(1108):20190975. PubMed ID: 31971819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early dark cortical band sign on CT for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from fat poor angiomyolipoma and detecting peritumoral pseudocapsule.
Ogawa Y; Morita S; Takagi T; Yoshida K; Tanabe K; Nagashima Y; Nishina Y; Sakai S
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5990-5997. PubMed ID: 33559699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exophytic renal masses: angular interface with renal parenchyma for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions at MR imaging.
Verma SK; Mitchell DG; Yang R; Roth CG; O'Kane P; Verma M; Parker L
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 20160001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New radiologic classification of renal angiomyolipomas.
Song S; Park BK; Park JJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1835-1842. PubMed ID: 27666625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Qualitative and quantitative analysis with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: diagnosis value in hypoechoic renal angiomyolipoma.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Wang WP; Li CX; Xue LY
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):334-41. PubMed ID: 25741195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Computed Tomography Still Have Limitations to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Renal Tumors for Radiologists?
Shin T; Duddalwar VA; Ukimura O; Matsugasumi T; Chen F; Ahmadi N; de Castro Abreu AL; Mimata H; Gill IS
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 28268233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT radiomics for differentiating fat poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dehghani Firouzabadi F; Gopal N; Hasani A; Homayounieh F; Li X; Jones EC; Yazdian Anari P; Turkbey E; Malayeri AA
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0287299. PubMed ID: 37498830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma.
Feng Z; Rong P; Cao P; Zhou Q; Zhu W; Yan Z; Liu Q; Wang W
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1625-1633. PubMed ID: 29134348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less Than 4 cm.
Kang HS; Park JJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 33660463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and lipid-poor angiomyolipoma by unenhanced, nephrographic, and delayed phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Ishigami K; Pakalniskis MG; Leite LV; Lee DK; Holanda DG; Rajput M
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 25457535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?
Simpfendorfer C; Herts BR; Motta-Ramirez GA; Lockwood DS; Zhou M; Leiber M; Remer EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 19155407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma.
Patel U; Simpson E; Kingswood JC; Saggar-Malik AK
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):665-73; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 16038693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
