BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36947221)

  • 1. Deep learning-based recognition of key anatomical structures during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    den Boer RB; Jaspers TJM; de Jongh C; Pluim JPW; van der Sommen F; Boers T; van Hillegersberg R; Van Eijnatten MAJM; Ruurda JP
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5164-5175. PubMed ID: 36947221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated Surgical-Phase Recognition for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using Artificial Intelligence.
    Takeuchi M; Kawakubo H; Saito K; Maeda Y; Matsuda S; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Oct; 29(11):6847-6855. PubMed ID: 35763234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A structured training pathway to implement robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: the learning curve results from a high-volume center.
    Kingma BF; Hadzijusufovic E; Van der Sluis PC; Bano E; Lang H; Ruurda JP; Hillegersberg van R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active learning for extracting surgomic features in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a prospective annotation study.
    Brandenburg JM; Jenke AC; Stern A; Daum MTJ; Schulze A; Younis R; Petrynowski P; Davitashvili T; Vanat V; Bhasker N; Schneider S; Mündermann L; Reinke A; Kolbinger FR; Jörns V; Fritz-Kebede F; Dugas M; Maier-Hein L; Klotz R; Distler M; Weitz J; Müller-Stich BP; Speidel S; Bodenstedt S; Wagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8577-8593. PubMed ID: 37833509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilization of artificial intelligence in minimally invasive right adrenalectomy: recognition of anatomical landmarks with deep learning.
    Sengun B; Iscan Y; Yazici ZA; Sormaz IC; Aksakal N; Tunca F; Ekenel HK; Giles Senyurek Y
    Acta Chir Belg; 2024 Jun; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38841838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
    van der Sluis PC; van Hillegersberg R
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 36-37():81-83. PubMed ID: 30551860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with side-to-side semi-mechanical anastomosis: analysis of a learning curve.
    Rebecchi F; Bonomo LD; Salzano A; Camandona M; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):907-916. PubMed ID: 35403978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
    Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.
    de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy: Results From 312 Cases.
    van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van der Horst S; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jul; 106(1):264-271. PubMed ID: 29454718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual center validation of deep learning for automated multi-label segmentation of thoracic anatomy in bedside chest radiographs.
    Busch F; Xu L; Sushko D; Weidlich M; Truhn D; Müller-Franzes G; Heimer MM; Niehues SM; Makowski MR; Hinsche M; Vahldiek JL; Aerts HJ; Adams LC; Bressem KK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jun; 234():107505. PubMed ID: 37003043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
    Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
    Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?
    Kanamori J; Watanabe M; Maruyama S; Kanie Y; Fujiwara D; Sakamoto K; Okamura A; Imamura Y
    Surg Today; 2022 Sep; 52(9):1246-1253. PubMed ID: 34853881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Progress in the application of robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Guo XF; Li ZG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 56(4):312-315. PubMed ID: 29562419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.