191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36947224)
21. Efficacy of Endoscopic Resection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Smaller than 15 mm.
Hamada Y; Tanaka K; Mukai K; Baba Y; Kobayashi M; Tominaga S; Kawabata H; Sawai S; Kaneko M; Sugimoto S; Inoue H; Mimuro M; Tamaru S; Nakagawa H
Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(7):3148-3157. PubMed ID: 37024740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.
Park HW; Byeon JS; Park YS; Yang DH; Yoon SM; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 20381798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in rectal neuroendocrine tumors based on resection margin status: a real-world study.
Sun D; Ren Z; Xu E; Cai S; Qi Z; Chen Z; Liu J; Shi Q; Zhou P; Zhong Y
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2644-2652. PubMed ID: 36380122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modified Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors ≤10 mm: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.
Gao X; Huang S; Wang Y; Peng Q; Li W; Zou Y; Han Z; Cai J; Luo Y; Ye Y; Li A; Bai Y; Chen Y; Liu S; Li Y
Am J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 117(12):1982-1989. PubMed ID: 36455222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Circumferential Incision and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumor.
Chen R; Liu X; Sun S; Wang S; Ge N; Wang G; Guo J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun; 26(3):e56-61. PubMed ID: 27213787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: a 10-year data analysis of Northern China.
Chen X; Li B; Wang S; Yang B; Zhu L; Ma S; Wu J; He Q; Zhao J; Zheng Z; Li S; Wang T; Liang L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 54(3):384-389. PubMed ID: 31037980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective and safe treatment for rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study.
Baek IH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 May; 20(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 20438309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Hamada Y; Tanaka K; Hattori A; Umeda Y; Yukimoto H; Yamada R; Nakamura M; Miura H; Tsuboi J; Katsurahara M; Horiki N; Takei Y
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):375-384. PubMed ID: 33492506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term prognosis of an endoscopically treated rectal neuroendocrine tumor: 10-year experience in a single institution.
Sung HY; Kim SW; Kang WK; Kim SY; Jung CK; Cho YK; Park JM; Lee IS; Choi MG; Chung IS
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Aug; 24(8):978-83. PubMed ID: 22647741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for foregut neuroendocrine tumors: an initial study.
Li QL; Zhang YQ; Chen WF; Xu MD; Zhong YS; Ma LL; Qin WZ; Hu JW; Cai MY; Yao LQ; Zhou PH
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(40):5799-806. PubMed ID: 23155323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤10mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou C; Zhang F; We Y
Ann Saudi Med; 2023; 43(3):179-195. PubMed ID: 37270677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Endoscopic resection yields reliable outcomes for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Jeon JH; Cheung DY; Lee SJ; Kim HJ; Kim HK; Cho HJ; Lee IK; Kim JI; Park SH; Kim JK
Dig Endosc; 2014 Jul; 26(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 24447261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Zhang J; Liu M; Li H; Chen J; Su H; Zheng J; Lin G; Lei X
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 42(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28750769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms].
Liu T; Liu P; Wu T; Pan Y; Chen G; Wang P; Jiang Y; Wu Y; Wang X
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 28900992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Endoscopic Treatment Outcome of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Removed by Ligation-assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Resection].
Gu MG; Lee SH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 72(3):128-134. PubMed ID: 30270594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic strategy and prognosis of 501 patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms attending a single center].
Zhang BL; Lu YX; Liang WQ; Gao YH; Xi HQ; Wang XX; Zhang KC; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 May; 26(5):459-466. PubMed ID: 37217354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos).
Yang DH; Park Y; Park SH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 May; 83(5):1015-22; quiz 1023-.e6. PubMed ID: 26460225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors According to the Pathologic Status After Initial Endoscopic Resection: A KASID Multicenter Study.
Moon CM; Huh KC; Jung SA; Park DI; Kim WH; Jung HM; Koh SJ; Kim JO; Jung Y; Kim KO; Kim JW; Yang DH; Shin JE; Shin SJ; Kim ES; Joo YE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Sep; 111(9):1276-85. PubMed ID: 27377520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis.
Zhang HP; Wu W; Yang S; Lin J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1345-53. PubMed ID: 27367942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
