572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36948010)
1. Application of a developed triple-classification machine learning model for carcinogenic prediction of hazardous organic chemicals to the US, EU, and WHO based on Chinese database.
Hao N; Sun P; Zhao W; Li X
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Apr; 255():114806. PubMed ID: 36948010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.
Wang J; Chen H; Wang H; Liu W; Peng D; Zhao Q; Xiao M
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e43815. PubMed ID: 37023416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
Ozcan I; Aydin H; Cetinkaya A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Oct; 23(10):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 36308351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by machine learning approaches.
Tan NX; Rao HB; Li ZR; Li XY
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(1-2):27-75. PubMed ID: 19343583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carcinogenicity prediction of noncongeneric chemicals by a support vector machine.
Zhong M; Nie X; Yan A; Yuan Q
Chem Res Toxicol; 2013 May; 26(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 23577695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CarcinoPred-EL: Novel models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals using molecular fingerprints and ensemble learning methods.
Zhang L; Ai H; Chen W; Yin Z; Hu H; Zhu J; Zhao J; Zhao Q; Liu H
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2118. PubMed ID: 28522849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of carcinogenicity for diverse chemicals based on substructure grouping and SVM modeling.
Tanabe K; Lučić B; Amić D; Kurita T; Kaihara M; Onodera N; Suzuki T
Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):789-802. PubMed ID: 20186479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient Model for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis: A Comparative Study of Several Machine Learning Algorithms.
Garavand A; Salehnasab C; Behmanesh A; Aslani N; Zadeh AH; Ghaderzadeh M
J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():5359540. PubMed ID: 36304749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disability risk prediction model based on machine learning among Chinese healthy older adults: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
Han Y; Wang S
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1271595. PubMed ID: 38026309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Machine and Modern Deep Learning Models.
Devi S; Kaul Ghanekar R; Pande JA; Dumbre D; Chavan R; Gupta H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Mar; 25(3):1077-1085. PubMed ID: 38546090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting Chemical Carcinogens Using a Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method.
Limbu S; Dakshanamurthy S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Machine learning model-based risk prediction of severe complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Zhang Y; Li L; Li Y; Zeng Z
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2023 Feb; 32(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 36226692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.
Tang J; Wang X; Wan H; Lin C; Shao Z; Chang Y; Wang H; Wu Y; Zhang T; Du Y
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Oct; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 36284327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A machine learning approach to predicting vascular calcification risk of type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study.
Liang X; Li X; Li G; Wang B; Liu Y; Sun D; Liu L; Zhang R; Ji S; Yan W; Yu R; Gao Z; Liu X
Clin Cardiol; 2024 Apr; 47(4):e24264. PubMed ID: 38563389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning-based prediction of hospital prolonged length of stay admission at emergency department: a Gradient Boosting algorithm analysis.
Zeleke AJ; Palumbo P; Tubertini P; Miglio R; Chiari L
Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1179226. PubMed ID: 37588696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different machine learning classification models for predicting deep vein thrombosis in lower extremity fractures.
Wei C; Wang J; Yu P; Li A; Xiong Z; Yuan Z; Yu L; Luo J
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6901. PubMed ID: 38519523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict distant metastasis in osteosarcoma.
Bai BL; Wu ZY; Weng SJ; Yang Q
Cancer Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):5025-5034. PubMed ID: 36082478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing machine learning algorithms to predict COVID‑19 mortality using a dataset including chest computed tomography severity score data.
Zakariaee SS; Naderi N; Ebrahimi M; Kazemi-Arpanahi H
Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11343. PubMed ID: 37443373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient Prediction of Missed Clinical Appointment Using Machine Learning.
Qureshi Z; Maqbool A; Mirza A; Iqbal MZ; Afzal F; Kanubala DD; Rana T; Umair MY; Wakeel A; Shah SK
Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():2376391. PubMed ID: 34721656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A machine learning model based on ultrasound image features to assess the risk of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: Applications of scikit-learn and SHAP.
Zhang G; Shi Y; Yin P; Liu F; Fang Y; Li X; Zhang Q; Zhang Z
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():944569. PubMed ID: 35957890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
