These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36950138)

  • 1. Conditioning on parental mating types can reduce necessary assumptions for Mendelian randomization.
    Ejima K; Liu N; Mestre LM; de Los Campos G; Allison DB
    Front Genet; 2023; 14():1014014. PubMed ID: 36950138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining Mendelian randomization with the sibling comparison design.
    Sjölander A; Frisell T; Öberg S; Wang Y; Hägg S
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):731-755. PubMed ID: 38073579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias in Mendelian randomization due to assortative mating.
    Hartwig FP; Davies NM; Davey Smith G
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 42(7):608-620. PubMed ID: 29971821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leveraging family data to design Mendelian randomization that is provably robust to population stratification.
    LaPierre N; Fu B; Turnbull S; Eskin E; Sankararaman S
    Genome Res; 2023 Jul; 33(7):1032-1041. PubMed ID: 37197991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leveraging family data to design Mendelian Randomization that is provably robust to population stratification.
    LaPierre N; Fu B; Turnbull S; Eskin E; Sankararaman S
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assortative mating by population of origin in a mechanistic model of admixture.
    Goldberg A; Rastogi A; Rosenberg NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Aug; 134():129-146. PubMed ID: 32275920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Migration and Assortative Mating on Admixture Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Zaitlen N; Huntsman S; Hu D; Spear M; Eng C; Oh SS; White MJ; Mak A; Davis A; Meade K; Brigino-Buenaventura E; LeNoir MA; Bibbins-Domingo K; Burchard EG; Halperin E
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):375-383. PubMed ID: 27879348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mendelian randomization.
    Sanderson E; Glymour MM; Holmes MV; Kang H; Morrison J; Munafò MR; Palmer T; Schooling CM; Wallace C; Zhao Q; Smith GD
    Nat Rev Methods Primers; 2022 Feb; 2():. PubMed ID: 37325194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assortative mating biases marker-based heritability estimators.
    Border R; O'Rourke S; de Candia T; Goddard ME; Visscher PM; Yengo L; Jones M; Keller MC
    Nat Commun; 2022 Feb; 13(1):660. PubMed ID: 35115518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TwoStepCisMR: A Novel Method and R Package for Attenuating Bias in
    Woolf B; Zagkos L; Gill D
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36140709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A general approach to sensitivity analysis for Mendelian randomization.
    Zhang W; Ghosh D
    Stat Biosci; 2021 Apr; 13(1):34-55. PubMed ID: 33737984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?
    Ogbuanu IU; Zhang H; Karmaus W
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2009 May; 6():3. PubMed ID: 19432981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relaxing parametric assumptions for non-linear Mendelian randomization using a doubly-ranked stratification method.
    Tian H; Mason AM; Liu C; Burgess S
    PLoS Genet; 2023 Jun; 19(6):e1010823. PubMed ID: 37390109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review.
    Spiga F; Gibson M; Dawson S; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Munafò MR; Higgins JPT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 52(1):227-249. PubMed ID: 35900265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets.
    Minelli C; Del Greco M F; van der Plaat DA; Bowden J; Sheehan NA; Thompson J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 33899104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis: a simulation study.
    Falk CT
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Nov; 61(5):1169-78. PubMed ID: 9345086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.