These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36950138)

  • 21. TwoStepCisMR: A Novel Method and R Package for Attenuating Bias in
    Woolf B; Zagkos L; Gill D
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36140709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relaxing parametric assumptions for non-linear Mendelian randomization using a doubly-ranked stratification method.
    Tian H; Mason AM; Liu C; Burgess S
    PLoS Genet; 2023 Jun; 19(6):e1010823. PubMed ID: 37390109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A general approach to sensitivity analysis for Mendelian randomization.
    Zhang W; Ghosh D
    Stat Biosci; 2021 Apr; 13(1):34-55. PubMed ID: 33737984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review.
    Spiga F; Gibson M; Dawson S; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Munafò MR; Higgins JPT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 52(1):227-249. PubMed ID: 35900265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?
    Ogbuanu IU; Zhang H; Karmaus W
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2009 May; 6():3. PubMed ID: 19432981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses.
    Brumpton B; Sanderson E; Heilbron K; Hartwig FP; Harrison S; Vie GÅ; Cho Y; Howe LD; Hughes A; Boomsma DI; Havdahl A; Hopper J; Neale M; Nivard MG; Pedersen NL; Reynolds CA; Tucker-Drob EM; Grotzinger A; Howe L; Morris T; Li S; ; ; Auton A; Windmeijer F; Chen WM; Bjørngaard JH; Hveem K; Willer C; Evans DM; Kaprio J; Davey Smith G; Åsvold BO; Hemani G; Davies NM
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3519. PubMed ID: 32665587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis: a simulation study.
    Falk CT
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Nov; 61(5):1169-78. PubMed ID: 9345086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MR-BOIL: Causal inference in one-sample Mendelian randomization for binary outcome with integrated likelihood method.
    Shi D; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Cao Y; Hu YQ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 47(4):332-357. PubMed ID: 36808763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
    Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Causal associations between liver traits and Colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
    Ni Y; Wang W; Liu Y; Jiang Y
    BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Dec; 16(1):316. PubMed ID: 38057864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets.
    Minelli C; Del Greco M F; van der Plaat DA; Bowden J; Sheehan NA; Thompson J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 33899104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Falsification of the instrumental variable conditions in Mendelian randomization studies in the UK Biobank.
    Guo K; Diemer EW; Labrecque JA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 38(9):921-927. PubMed ID: 37253997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A General Approach to Adjusting Genetic Studies for Assortative Mating.
    Bilghese M; Manansala R; Jaishankar D; Jala J; Benjamin DJ; Kimball M; Auer PL; Livermore MA; Turley P
    bioRxiv; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37732240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of indirect genetic effects and heritability under assortative mating.
    Young AS
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37503158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correct illustration of assumptions in Mendelian randomization.
    Carter AR; Anderson EL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 53(2):. PubMed ID: 38580457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].
    Wang LN; Zhang Z
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 38(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 28468080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.