These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36951831)

  • 1. Ordering Eyeglasses Using 3D Head Scan Technology versus Established Online and Storefront Clinic Methods.
    Fontaine N; Hanssens JM; Nguyen M; Bérubé O
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 May; 100(5):319-327. PubMed ID: 36951831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of physiognomy and frame angle parameters using different devices to prescribe progressive addition lenses.
    Garcia-Espinilla O; Gallegos-Cocho I; Sanchez I; Cañadas P; Martin R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2022 May; 105(4):420-427. PubMed ID: 33971792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and Repeatability of Internet-ordered Spectacle Lenses.
    Gordon A; Twa MD; Cutter G; Kleinstein RN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Dec; 98(12):1340-1347. PubMed ID: 34905522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of progressive addition lenses for general purpose and for computer vision: an office field study.
    Jaschinski W; König M; Mekontso TM; Ohlendorf A; Welscher M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 May; 98(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 25963114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer vision syndrome in presbyopia and beginning presbyopia: effects of spectacle lens type.
    Jaschinski W; König M; Mekontso TM; Ohlendorf A; Welscher M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 May; 98(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 25963113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.
    Zamora-de La Cruz D; Zúñiga-Posselt K; Bartlett J; Gutierrez M; Abariga SA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jun; 6(6):CD012648. PubMed ID: 32584432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Presbyopic Personal Computer Work: A Comparison of Progressive Addition Lenses for General Purpose and Personal Computer Work.
    Kolbe O; Degle S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Nov; 95(11):1046-1053. PubMed ID: 30339644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical performance of progressive addition lenses with poorly measured individual parameters.
    Pascual E; Gómez-Pedrero JA; Alonso J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Mar; 43(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 36624926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Compensating presbyopia: a new physiological progressive lens (author's transl)].
    Manent PJ; Pecheur J; Maille M; Claude R
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1981; 4(11):757-61. PubMed ID: 7328271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nijkamp MD; Dolders MG; de Brabander J; van den Borne B; Hendrikse F; Nuijts RM
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15465543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correcting Presbyopia With Autofocusing Liquid-Lens Eyeglasses.
    Karkhanis MU; Ghosh C; Banerjee A; Hasan N; Likhite R; Ghosh T; Kim H; Mastrangelo CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Jan; 69(1):390-400. PubMed ID: 34232861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.
    Rueff EM; Bailey MD
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 28343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individually designed PALs vs. power optimized PALs adaptation comparison.
    Muždalo NV; Mihelčič M
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Mar; 39(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 26040069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive eyeglasses for presbyopia correction: an original variable-focus technology.
    Jarosz J; Molliex N; Chenon G; Berge B
    Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(8):10533-10552. PubMed ID: 31052911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.
    Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Ho A
    J Optom; 2018; 11(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of wearing corrective lenses for presbyopia on distance vision.
    McGarry MB; Manning TM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2003 Jan; 23(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 12535052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical and Visual Quality With Physical and Visually Simulated Presbyopic Multifocal Contact Lenses.
    Vinas M; Aissati S; Gonzalez-Ramos AM; Romero M; Sawides L; Akondi V; Gambra E; Dorronsoro C; Karkkainen T; Nankivil D; Marcos S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 9(10):20. PubMed ID: 33005478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Quest for Spectacle Independence: A Comparison of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implants and Pseudophakic Monovision for Patients with Presbyopia.
    Greenstein S; Pineda R
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(1):111-115. PubMed ID: 27792408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.