These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36958116)

  • 1. Comparison between droplet digital PCR and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR methods to measure ecotoxicology biomarkers.
    Baettig CG; Zirngibl M; Smith KF; Lear G; Tremblay LA
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 May; 190():114829. PubMed ID: 36958116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-Step Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR Protocols for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and Quantification.
    Nyaruaba R; Li X; Mwaliko C; Ogolla F; Li C; Zhao L; Yang H; Yu J; Wei H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2452():147-166. PubMed ID: 35554906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-Step Multiplexed Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Quantification of p190 BCR-ABL1 Fusion Transcript in B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
    Martinez RJ; Kang Q; Nennig D; Bailey NG; Brown NA; Betz BL; Tewari M; Thyagarajan B; Bachanova V; Mroz P
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jan; 146(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 33769465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR technologies for circulating microRNA quantification in human lung cancer.
    Campomenosi P; Gini E; Noonan DM; Poli A; D'Antona P; Rotolo N; Dominioni L; Imperatori A
    BMC Biotechnol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 27538962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a reverse transcription droplet digital PCR assay for sensitive detection of peach latent mosaic viroid.
    Lee HJ; Cho IS; Ju HJ; Jeong RD
    Mol Cell Probes; 2021 Aug; 58():101746. PubMed ID: 34102255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets.
    Park C; Lee J; Hassan ZU; Ku KB; Kim SJ; Kim HG; Park EC; Park GS; Park D; Baek SH; Park D; Lee J; Jeon S; Kim S; Lee CS; Yoo HM; Kim S
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):358-367. PubMed ID: 33397829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Analytical Validation of a 6-Plex Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR Assay for the Absolute Quantification of Prostate Cancer Biomarkers in Circulating Tumor Cells of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Zavridou M; Smilkou S; Tserpeli V; Sfika A; Bournakis E; Strati A; Lianidou E
    Clin Chem; 2022 Oct; 68(10):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 36093578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of reverse-transcriptase qPCR and droplet digital PCR for the quantification of dengue virus nucleic acid.
    Abachin E; Convers S; Falque S; Esson R; Mallet L; Nougarede N
    Biologicals; 2018 Mar; 52():49-54. PubMed ID: 29398345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR in marine bivalve ecotoxicology: Systematic review and case study using copper treated primary Ruditapes philippinarum hemocytes.
    Volland M; Blasco J; Hampel M
    Aquat Toxicol; 2017 Apr; 185():86-94. PubMed ID: 28189915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and Analytical Validation of a Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) Assay for PD-L1 Transcripts in Circulating Tumor Cells.
    Strati A; Zavridou M; Economopoulou P; Gkolfinopoulos S; Psyrri A; Lianidou E
    Clin Chem; 2021 Mar; 67(4):642-652. PubMed ID: 33421061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR vs reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time PCR for serum HBV RNA quantification.
    Limothai U; Chuaypen N; Poovorawan K; Chotiyaputta W; Tanwandee T; Poovorawan Y; Tangkijvanich P
    J Med Virol; 2020 Dec; 92(12):3365-3372. PubMed ID: 32219874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a novel reverse transcription droplet digital PCR assay for the sensitive detection of Senecavirus A.
    Zhang Z; Zhang Y; Lin X; Chen Z; Wu S
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2019 Jan; 66(1):517-525. PubMed ID: 30375741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analytical validation of a reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) for quantitative detection of infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus.
    Jia P; Purcell MK; Pan G; Wang J; Kan S; Liu Y; Zheng X; Shi X; He J; Yu L; Hua Q; Lu T; Lan W; Winton JR; Jin N; Liu H
    J Virol Methods; 2017 Jul; 245():73-80. PubMed ID: 28347708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micro-droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Technologies Provide Highly Sensitive and Accurate Detection of Zika Virus.
    Hui Y; Wu Z; Qin Z; Zhu L; Liang J; Li X; Fu H; Feng S; Yu J; He X; Lu W; Xiao W; Wu Q; Zhang B; Zhao W
    Virol Sin; 2018 Jun; 33(3):270-277. PubMed ID: 29931514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of droplet digital PCR for quantitative detection of Spiroplasma citri in comparison with real time PCR.
    Maheshwari Y; Selvaraj V; Hajeri S; Yokomi R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184751. PubMed ID: 28910375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Reverse Transcription (RT)-Quantitative PCR and RT-Droplet Digital PCR for Detection of Genomic and Subgenomic SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
    Morón-López S; Riveira-Muñoz E; Urrea V; Gutiérrez-Chamorro L; Ávila-Nieto C; Noguera-Julian M; Carrillo J; Mitjà O; Mateu L; Massanella M; Ballana E; Martinez-Picado J
    Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Mar; 11(2):e0415922. PubMed ID: 36943067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and application of a reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) for sensitive and rapid detection of Japanese encephalitis virus.
    Wu X; Lin H; Chen S; Xiao L; Yang M; An W; Wang Y; Yao X; Yang Z
    J Virol Methods; 2017 Oct; 248():166-171. PubMed ID: 28673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between RT droplet digital PCR and RT real-time PCR for quantification of noroviruses in oysters.
    Persson S; Eriksson R; Lowther J; Ellström P; Simonsson M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 284():73-83. PubMed ID: 30005929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of reverse-transcription qPCR and droplet digital PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens of hospitalized patients.
    Li J; Lin W; Du P; Liu W; Liu X; Yang C; Jia R; Wang Y; Chen Y; Jia L; Han L; Tan W; Liu N; Du J; Ke Y; Wang C
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2022 Jun; 103(2):115677. PubMed ID: 35417835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Real-Time PCR and Droplet Digital PCR for the Quantitative Detection of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum.
    Choi CH; Kim E; Yang SM; Kim DS; Suh SM; Lee GY; Kim HY
    Foods; 2022 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35564054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.