These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36958296)
1. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users. Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users. Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users. Kranick M; Wagner L; Plontke S; Rahne T Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 May; 22(3):121-127. PubMed ID: 33297872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users. Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials. Bogdanov C; Mulders WHAM; Goulios H; Távora-Vieira D Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 37690449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical reorganization after cochlear implantation for adults with single-sided deafness. Legris E; Galvin J; Roux S; Gomot M; Aoustin JM; Marx M; He S; Bakhos D PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204402. PubMed ID: 30248131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception. Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e63-74. PubMed ID: 24231629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study. Attias J; HabibAllah S; Aditya Tarigoppula VS; Glick H; Chen C; Kanthaiah K; Litvak L Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 35245922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures. Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness. Wedekind A; Rajan G; Van Dun B; Távora-Vieira D PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227371. PubMed ID: 31935234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users. van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users. Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do the minimum and maximum comfortable stimulation levels influence the cortical potential latencies or the speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users? Martins KVC; Goffi-Gomez MVS; Tsuji RK; Bento RF Hear Res; 2021 May; 404():108206. PubMed ID: 33677193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrically evoked late latency response using single electrode stimulation and its relation to speech perception among paediatric cochlear implant users. Saravanan P; Devi N; Geetha C Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1441854. PubMed ID: 39345947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users. Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinically recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials from paediatric cochlear implant users fitted with electrically elicited stapedius reflex thresholds. Kosaner J; Van Dun B; Yigit O; Gultekin M; Bayguzina S Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():100-112. PubMed ID: 29605337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peripheral Neural Synchrony in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users. He S; Skidmore J; Bruce IC; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y Ear Hear; 2024 Sep-Oct 01; 45(5):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 38503720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]