124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36959166)
1. The effect of dose gradients on gamma comparison insensitivity in patient specific QA comparisons.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3671-3686. PubMed ID: 36959166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems.
Hussein M; Rowshanfarzad P; Ebert MA; Nisbet A; Clark CH
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 24100148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Error detection and classification in patient-specific IMRT QA with dual neural networks.
Potter NJ; Mund K; Andreozzi JM; Li JG; Liu C; Yan G
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4711-4720. PubMed ID: 33460182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Error detection model developed using a multi-task convolutional neural network in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Kimura Y; Kadoya N; Oku Y; Kajikawa T; Tomori S; Jingu K
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4769-4783. PubMed ID: 34101848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance.
Saito M; Sano N; Shibata Y; Kuriyama K; Komiyama T; Marino K; Aoki S; Ashizawa K; Yoshizawa K; Onishi H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):87-93. PubMed ID: 29500857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic evaluation of spatial resolution and gamma criteria for quality assurance with detector arrays in stereotactic radiosurgery.
Stedem AK; Tutty M; Chofor N; Langhans M; Kleefeld C; Schönfeld AA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14274. PubMed ID: 38265979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Li G; Bai S; Chen N; Henderson L; Wu K; Xiao J; Zhang Y; Jiang Q; Jiang X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):13-24. PubMed ID: 24036856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels.
Nelms BE; Chan MF; Jarry G; Lemire M; Lowden J; Hampton C; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111722. PubMed ID: 24320430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Delta
Tang D; Yang Z; Dai X; Cao Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820945816. PubMed ID: 32720589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of MLC model parameters for Monaco using commercial diode arrays.
Kinsella P; Shields L; McCavana P; McClean B; Langan B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):37-47. PubMed ID: 27455495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA.
Aristophanous M; Suh Y; Chi PC; Whittlesey LJ; LaNeave S; Martel MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):20-33. PubMed ID: 27685107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA.
Woon W; Ravindran PB; Ekayanake P; S V; Lim YY; Khalid J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):230-248. PubMed ID: 29460465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting MLC modeling errors using radiomics-based machine learning in patient-specific QA with an EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Sakai M; Nakano H; Kawahara D; Tanabe S; Takizawa T; Narita A; Yamada T; Sakai H; Ueda M; Sasamoto R; Kaidu M; Aoyama H; Ishikawa H; Utsunomiya S
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):991-1002. PubMed ID: 33382467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
