154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36959322)
1. Cue: a deep-learning framework for structural variant discovery and genotyping.
Popic V; Rohlicek C; Cunial F; Hajirasouliha I; Meleshko D; Garimella K; Maheshwari A
Nat Methods; 2023 Apr; 20(4):559-568. PubMed ID: 36959322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data.
Linderman MD; Wallace J; van der Heyde A; Wieman E; Brey D; Shi Y; Hansen P; Shamsi Z; Liu J; Gelb BD; Bashir A
Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 38444093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NPSV: A simulation-driven approach to genotyping structural variants in whole-genome sequencing data.
Linderman MD; Paudyal C; Shakeel M; Kelley W; Bashir A; Gelb BD
Gigascience; 2021 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34195837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MAMnet: detecting and genotyping deletions and insertions based on long reads and a deep learning approach.
Ding H; Luo J
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35580841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SVJedi: genotyping structural variations with long reads.
Lecompte L; Peterlongo P; Lavenier D; Lemaitre C
Bioinformatics; 2020 Nov; 36(17):4568-4575. PubMed ID: 32437523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated filtering of genome-wide large deletions through an ensemble deep learning framework.
Hu Y; Mangal S; Zhang L; Zhou X
Methods; 2022 Oct; 206():77-86. PubMed ID: 36038049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing breakpoint resolution with deep segmentation model: A general refinement method for read-depth based structural variant callers.
Zhang YZ; Imoto S; Miyano S; Yamaguchi R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Oct; 17(10):e1009186. PubMed ID: 34634042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. StrVCTVRE: A supervised learning method to predict the pathogenicity of human genome structural variants.
Sharo AG; Hu Z; Sunyaev SR; Brenner SE
Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Feb; 109(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 35032432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SVcnn: an accurate deep learning-based method for detecting structural variation based on long-read data.
Zheng Y; Shang X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 24(1):213. PubMed ID: 37221476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of computational genotyping of structural variation for clinical diagnoses.
Chander V; Gibbs RA; Sedlazeck FJ
Gigascience; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31494671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PhenoSV: interpretable phenotype-aware model for the prioritization of genes affected by structural variants.
Xu Z; Li Q; Marchionni L; Wang K
Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7805. PubMed ID: 38016949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LinkedSV for detection of mosaic structural variants from linked-read exome and genome sequencing data.
Fang L; Kao C; Gonzalez MV; Mafra FA; Pellegrino da Silva R; Li M; Wenzel SS; Wimmer K; Hakonarson H; Wang K
Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5585. PubMed ID: 31811119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing structural variation in a personal genome-towards a human reference diploid genome.
English AC; Salerno WJ; Hampton OA; Gonzaga-Jauregui C; Ambreth S; Ritter DI; Beck CR; Davis CF; Dahdouli M; Ma S; Carroll A; Veeraraghavan N; Bruestle J; Drees B; Hastie A; Lam ET; White S; Mishra P; Wang M; Han Y; Zhang F; Stankiewicz P; Wheeler DA; Reid JG; Muzny DM; Rogers J; Sabo A; Worley KC; Lupski JR; Boerwinkle E; Gibbs RA
BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):286. PubMed ID: 25886820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GraphTyper2 enables population-scale genotyping of structural variation using pangenome graphs.
Eggertsson HP; Kristmundsdottir S; Beyter D; Jonsson H; Skuladottir A; Hardarson MT; Gudbjartsson DF; Stefansson K; Halldorsson BV; Melsted P
Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5402. PubMed ID: 31776332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A crowdsourced set of curated structural variants for the human genome.
Chapman LM; Spies N; Pai P; Lim CS; Carroll A; Narzisi G; Watson CM; Proukakis C; Clarke WE; Nariai N; Dawson E; Jones G; Blankenberg D; Brueffer C; Xiao C; Kolora SRR; Alexander N; Wolujewicz P; Ahmed AE; Smith G; Shehreen S; Wenger AM; Salit M; Zook JM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Jun; 16(6):e1007933. PubMed ID: 32559231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A deep learning approach for filtering structural variants in short read sequencing data.
Liu Y; Huang Y; Wang G; Wang Y
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33378767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV.
Jiang T; Liu Y; Jiang Y; Li J; Gao Y; Cui Z; Liu Y; Liu B; Wang Y
Genome Biol; 2020 Aug; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 32746918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parliament2: Accurate structural variant calling at scale.
Zarate S; Carroll A; Mahmoud M; Krasheninina O; Jun G; Salerno WJ; Schatz MC; Boerwinkle E; Gibbs RA; Sedlazeck FJ
Gigascience; 2020 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33347570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A sequence-aware merger of genomic structural variations at population scale.
Zheng Z; Zhu M; Zhang J; Liu X; Hou L; Liu W; Yuan S; Luo C; Yao X; Liu J; Yang Y
Nat Commun; 2024 Feb; 15(1):960. PubMed ID: 38307885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
