These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36959440)

  • 1. Illuminating the "Twilight Zone": Advances in Difficult Protein Modeling.
    Bartuzi D; Kaczor AA; Matosiuk D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2627():25-40. PubMed ID: 36959440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.
    Haas J; Barbato A; Behringer D; Studer G; Roth S; Bertoni M; Mostaguir K; Gumienny R; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):387-398. PubMed ID: 29178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General overview on structure prediction of twilight-zone proteins.
    Khor BY; Tye GJ; Lim TS; Choong YS
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2015 Sep; 12():15. PubMed ID: 26338054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age.
    Schaarschmidt J; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Bonvin AMJJ
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):51-66. PubMed ID: 29071738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13.
    Hou J; Wu T; Cao R; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1165-1178. PubMed ID: 30985027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introducing "best single template" models as reference baseline for the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO).
    Haas J; Gumienny R; Barbato A; Ackermann F; Tauriello G; Bertoni M; Studer G; Smolinski A; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1378-1387. PubMed ID: 31571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein contact prediction by integrating deep multiple sequence alignments, coevolution and machine learning.
    Adhikari B; Hou J; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):84-96. PubMed ID: 29047157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Template-based and free modeling of I-TASSER and QUARK pipelines using predicted contact maps in CASP12.
    Zhang C; Mortuza SM; He B; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):136-151. PubMed ID: 29082551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving fragment-based ab initio protein structure assembly using low-accuracy contact-map predictions.
    Mortuza SM; Zheng W; Zhang C; Li Y; Pearce R; Zhang Y
    Nat Commun; 2021 Aug; 12(1):5011. PubMed ID: 34408149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast and accurate Ab Initio Protein structure prediction using deep learning potentials.
    Pearce R; Li Y; Omenn GS; Zhang Y
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 18(9):e1010539. PubMed ID: 36112717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond the Twilight Zone: automated prediction of structural properties of proteins by recursive neural networks and remote homology information.
    Mooney C; Pollastri G
    Proteins; 2009 Oct; 77(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 19422056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modular prediction of protein structural classes from sequences of twilight-zone identity with predicting sequences.
    Mizianty MJ; Kurgan L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():414. PubMed ID: 20003388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ab initio and template-based prediction of multi-class distance maps by two-dimensional recursive neural networks.
    Walsh I; Baù D; Martin AJ; Mooney C; Vullo A; Pollastri G
    BMC Struct Biol; 2009 Jan; 9():5. PubMed ID: 19183478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing Predicted Contacts for Building Protein Three-Dimensional Models.
    Adhikari B; Bhattacharya D; Cao R; Cheng J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1484():115-126. PubMed ID: 27787823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent advances in sequence-based protein structure prediction.
    Kc DB
    Brief Bioinform; 2017 Nov; 18(6):1021-1032. PubMed ID: 27562963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topology evaluation of models for difficult targets in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14).
    Kinch LN; Pei J; Kryshtafovych A; Schaeffer RD; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2021 Dec; 89(12):1673-1686. PubMed ID: 34240477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. State-of-the-art web services for de novo protein structure prediction.
    Abriata LA; Dal Peraro M
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 34020540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hybridized distance- and contact-based hierarchical structure modeling for folding soluble and membrane proteins.
    Roche R; Bhattacharya S; Bhattacharya D
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1008753. PubMed ID: 33621244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting distant-homology protein structures by aligning deep neural-network based contact maps.
    Zheng W; Wuyun Q; Li Y; Mortuza SM; Zhang C; Pearce R; Ruan J; Zhang Y
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Oct; 15(10):e1007411. PubMed ID: 31622328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.