162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36960017)
1. The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An
Bajoghli F; Fathi A; Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Sabouhi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():22. PubMed ID: 36960017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study.
Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Davoudi A; Fathi A; Ziaei M; Berg E
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Aug; 8(4):1002-1007. PubMed ID: 35618682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of titanium copings to implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Chiam SY; Lee HL; Bedrossian AE; Xu Q; Kuykendall W; Ren A; Hess TA; Ramos V; Chung KH
J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 37203989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation.
Rödiger M; Rinke S; Ehret-Kleinau F; Pohlmeyer F; Lange K; Bürgers R; Gersdorff N
J Adv Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 6(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25006388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of marginal leakage and retentive strength of implant-supported milled zirconia and cobalt-chromium copings cemented with different temporary cements.
Hendi A; Falahchai M; Sigaroodi SH; Asli HN
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():117. PubMed ID: 38169570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments.
Safari S; Hosseini Ghavam F; Amini P; Yaghmaei K
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29503708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of different temporary cements tested on zirconia crowns and titanium abutments in vitro.
Dähne F; Meißner H; Böning K; Arnold C; Gutwald R; Prause E
Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):62. PubMed ID: 34282495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Temporary Cements on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Cement to the Metal Coronal Substrate.
Peixoto RF; De Aguiar CR; Jacob ES; Macedo AP; De Mattos Mda G; Antunes RP
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(6):637-41. PubMed ID: 26963209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography.
El-Helbawy NG; El-Hatery AA; Ahmed MH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 27183064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Cement Type and Cementation Technique on the Retention of Implant-Supported Restorations.
Zeinabadi Z; Nami M; Naserkhaki M; Tavakolizadeh S
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2020; 30(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 33389917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of cleaning methods on retentive values of saliva-contaminated implant-supported zirconia copings.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):530-536. PubMed ID: 29656421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment and comparison of retention of zirconia copings luted with different cements onto zirconia and titanium abutments: An in vitro study.
Menon NS; Kumar GP; Jnanadev KR; Satish Babu CL; Shetty S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 27141162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effect of surface roughness and modification of implant abutment axial wall on the retention of zirconium oxide copings before and after thermocycling.
Amini P; Hejazi M; Taghva M; Safari S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e399-e405. PubMed ID: 38725819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.
Song MY; An H; Park EJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e210-e215. PubMed ID: 28598530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
