These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36960017)

  • 21. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
    Müller L; Rauch A; Reissmann DR; Schierz O
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
    Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aluminum Oxide Sandblasting of Hexagonal Coping and Abutment: Influence on Retention and Marginal Leakage Using Temporary Cements.
    Okuyama JY; de Brito RB; França FM
    Implant Dent; 2016 Jun; 25(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 26990606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retention of zirconia copings over smooth and airborne-particle-abraded titanium bases with different resin cements.
    Linkevicius T; Caplikas A; Dumbryte I; Linkeviciene L; Svediene O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):949-954. PubMed ID: 30711294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention.
    Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
    Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments.
    Lopes ACO; Machado CM; Bonjardim LR; Bergamo ETP; Ramalho IS; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e552-e556. PubMed ID: 29961986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases - an
    Oddbratt E; Hua L; Chrcanovic BR; Papia E
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2021; 8(1):129-136. PubMed ID: 34532710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative Evaluation of Tensile Bond Strength of Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Zirconia Copings Using Resin Cement with or without Adhesive: An In Vitro Study.
    Kakkad N; Yadav NS; Hazari P; Narwani S; Somkuwar K; Basha S; Verma V; Arora S; Aldowah O; Heboyan A; Karobari MI
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 35744226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
    Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An
    Sarfaraz H; Hassan A; Shenoy KK; Shetty M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 31040551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
    Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
    Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retention of luting agents used for implant-supported restorations: A comparative
    Aladag A; Sahan MH; Akkus NO; Aktas R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1073-1078. PubMed ID: 32788484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study.
    Kapoor R; Singh K; Kaur S; Arora A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Apr; 10(4):ZC61-4. PubMed ID: 27190954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laser retrieval of cemented zirconia single unit implant restoration: A pilot study: Part I - Force values.
    Shah K; McGlumphy E; Lee DJ; Seghi RR; Sharples DS; Kim DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(4):425–433. PubMed ID: 33662063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.