These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36960017)

  • 41. Bond strength of luting materials to ceramic crowns after different surface treatments.
    Derand T; Molin M; Kleven E; Haag P; Karlsson S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Mar; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 18468323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents.
    Pinelli LA; Fais LM; Ricci WA; Reis JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 23684282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
    Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An
    Bhavana BL; Rupesh PL; Kataraki B
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 30745751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retention force of secondary crowns to copings after temporary cementation: the effect of crown material and luting agent.
    Mundt T; Heinemann F; Golecki G; Schwahn C; Biffar R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Dec; 55(6):335-40. PubMed ID: 20961184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of mechanical and chemo-mechanical temporary cement cleaning methods on shear bond strength with self-adhesive resin cement (an in-vitro study).
    Arafa AM; Aboalazm E; Kamel MH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):648. PubMed ID: 36578003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Pinés-Hueso J; Ellakuria-Echebarria J
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():2107027. PubMed ID: 27822468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of Different Cleaning Procedures on Tensile Bond Strength Between Zirconia Abutment and Titanium Base.
    Wiedenmann F; Liebermann A; Spintzyk S; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1318-1327. PubMed ID: 31711075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
    Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment of the tensile strength of hexagonal abutments using different cementing agents.
    Wahl C; França FM; Brito RB; Basting RT; Smanio H
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19148383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Vertical Marginal Discrepancy of Retrievable Cement/Screw-retained Design and Cement-retained Implant-supported Single Metal Copings.
    Tinedo-López PL; Malpartida-Carrillo V; Ortiz-Culca F; Guerrero ME; Amaya-Pajares SP; Özcan M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):829-834. PubMed ID: 33568600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.