These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3696004)

  • 1. Future directions of MPRO.
    Horvat GG
    Mich Med; 1987 Dec; 86(12):798. PubMed ID: 3696004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of utilization management/review.
    Delaney A
    QRC Advis; 1993 Oct; 9(12):1-4. PubMed ID: 10128862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PSROs: origins, directions, and changing assumptions.
    Smits H
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7052174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PSROs' stormy past and questionable future.
    Sandrick KM
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1981 Nov; 7(11):4-8. PubMed ID: 6801574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PSRO officials, citing improved conditions, optimistic about future. Interview by James Stacey.
    Weeks HS
    Am Med News; 1980 Oct; 23(41):7. PubMed ID: 10273230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of quality assurance and PSROs.
    Gertman PM
    Med Care; 1981 Mar; 19(3):253-4. PubMed ID: 7194404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Private medical review.
    Gdula JM
    Tex Hosp; 1983 Jan; 38(8):36-7. PubMed ID: 10273326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The origins and evolution of peer review organizations.
    Dettmann FG
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1995 Jul; 21(7):322-4. PubMed ID: 7581732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed opinion. Perceptions on PSRO.
    Nelson AR
    West J Med; 1979 Nov; 131(5):451-4. PubMed ID: 575249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current status of PSROs.
    Peck RL
    Physicians Manage; 1981 May; 21(5):95, 98, 100. PubMed ID: 10273258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lessons from the past.
    Nelson AR
    Internist; 1984 Jan; 25(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 10273465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The PRO: friend or foe?
    Albertson D
    Physicians Manage; 1984 May; 24(5):51-2, 57. PubMed ID: 10310575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Will physician peer review succeed?
    Pierson RN
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 10301022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospitals face tougher PRO reviews.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(3):16. PubMed ID: 10275195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. WIPRO/HCFA futility.
    Mayersak JS
    Wis Med J; 1986 Nov; 85(11):16-7. PubMed ID: 3811389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Now playing, a tragi-comedy in 3 acts: the changing (disappearing?) face of PSRO.
    Thompson RE
    Second Opin Health Care Issues; 1981 May; 2(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 10273263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MDs should continue to support PSROs.
    Medlar RE
    Mich Med; 1981 Apr; 80(11):168. PubMed ID: 6894478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Will this be the year they kill P.S.R.O.s?
    Peck RL
    Med Econ; 1978 Jan; 55(2):35, 39, 43 passim. PubMed ID: 10306102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The peer review process: new focus, new directions.
    Sweet D
    Ohio Med; 1987 Jul; 83(7):464, 467-71, 485. PubMed ID: 3627684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PSRO and options for the future.
    Sanazaro PJ
    West J Med; 1974 Apr; 120(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 4856622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.