These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36960118)

  • 21. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
    Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of invasive arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurement in patients with sepsis.
    Jiang Z; Li S; Wang L; Yu F; Zeng Y; Li H; Li J; Zhang Z; Zuo J
    J Anesth; 2024 Apr; 38(2):222-231. PubMed ID: 38305914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of invasive blood pressure monitoring vs. non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in critically ill children receiving vasoactive agents-a prospective observational study.
    Shah S; Kaul A; Nagarkar R; Thorat A
    Front Pediatr; 2024; 12():1376327. PubMed ID: 38887566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Systolic blood pressure measurements are unreliable for the management of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Garg RK; Ouyang B; Zwein A; Thavapalan V; Indavarapu A; Cheponis K; Osteraas N; Ezzeldin M; Pandya V; Ramesh A; Bleck TP
    J Crit Care; 2022 Aug; 70():154049. PubMed ID: 35490501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring vs. Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Preterm Infants < 37 Weeks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit- A Prospective Observational Study.
    Shah S; Kaul A; Khandare J; Dhalait S
    J Trop Pediatr; 2021 Dec; 67(6):. PubMed ID: 34966946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences in orthostatic blood pressure changes measured with an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Iqbal P; Fotherby MD; Potter JF
    Blood Press; 1996 Jul; 5(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 8809373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using semi-automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in diabetic patients and their offspring.
    Kuo CS; Hwu CM; Kwok CF; Hsiao LC; Weih MJ; Lee SH; Ho LT
    J Diabetes Complications; 2000; 14(5):288-93. PubMed ID: 11113693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of resting blood pressure measurement and classification using an oscillometric device in children with chronic kidney disease.
    Flynn JT; Pierce CB; Miller ER; Charleston J; Samuels JA; Kupferman J; Furth SL; Warady BA;
    J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):434-440.e1. PubMed ID: 22048052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blood pressure monitoring following kidney transplantation in children: a comparison of invasive and noninvasive measurements using Doppler as a benchmark technique.
    Kaplan E; Kadmon G; Nahum E; Alfandary H; Haskin O; Weissbach A
    Pediatr Nephrol; 2023 Apr; 38(4):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 35913567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.