These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36960233)

  • 21. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conspiracy beliefs of Italian voters for populist parties: The moderated mediational role of political interest and ideological attitudes.
    Salvati M; Giacomantonio M; Pellegrini V; De Cristofaro V; Leone L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Mar; 223():103508. PubMed ID: 35065530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Political ideology and pandemic lifestyles: the indirect effects of empathy, authoritarianism, and threat.
    Hill TD; Garcia-Alexander G; Davis AP; Bjorklund ET; Vila-Henninger LA; Cockerham WC
    Discov Soc Sci Health; 2022; 2(1):14. PubMed ID: 36033356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Smith N
    Society; 2020; 57(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 33424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence.
    Coeckelbergh M
    AI Ethics; 2022 Nov; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 36466152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Populism and health policy: three international case studies of right-wing populist policy frames.
    Speed E; Mannion R
    Sociol Health Illn; 2020 Nov; 42(8):1967-1981. PubMed ID: 32780437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Longitudinal trajectories of coronavirus anxiety and health behavior use before and after the U.S. 2020 presidential election: The effects of political orientation.
    Olatunji BO; Cox RC; Cole DA
    J Anxiety Disord; 2022 Dec; 92():102643. PubMed ID: 36283183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beliefs about the nature of knowledge shape responses to the pandemic: Epistemic beliefs, the Dark Factor of Personality, and COVID-19-related conspiracy ideation and behavior.
    Rudloff JP; Hutmacher F; Appel M
    J Pers; 2022 Dec; 90(6):937-955. PubMed ID: 35152440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conservatism and infrequent mask usage: A study of US counties during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
    Gonzalez KE; James R; Bjorklund ET; Hill TD
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Sep; 102(5):2368-2382. PubMed ID: 34908612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Did Covid-19 Kill Trump Politically? The Pandemic and Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Clarke H; Stewart MC; Ho K
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Sep; 102(5):2194-2209. PubMed ID: 34226770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In Suspense: Donald Trump's Efforts to Undermine Public Trust in Democracy.
    Fried A; Harris DB
    Society; 2020; 57(5):527-533. PubMed ID: 33144745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
    Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are political-opinion pollsters missing ambivalence: "I love Trump"… "I hate Trump".
    Camparo JC; Camparo LB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247580. PubMed ID: 33705443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
    Clayton K; Davis NT; Nyhan B; Porter E; Ryan TJ; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34078668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez KA; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Tibbett T
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29494200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Examining the Impact of the Obama and Trump Candidacies on Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism in the United States: A Time-Series Analysis.
    Fortunato O; Dierenfeldt R; Basham S; McGuffee K
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23397-NP23418. PubMed ID: 35236192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. U.S. Foreign Policy on the Verge of a New Path.
    Prikhodko OV
    Her Russ Acad Sci; 2021; 91(6):667-676. PubMed ID: 35125840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.