These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36962010)
1. Using Stapes Velocity to Estimate the Efficacy of Mechanical Stimulation of the Round Window With an Active Middle Ear Implant. Tollin DJ; Koka K; Peacock J Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):e311-e318. PubMed ID: 36962010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of auditory responses determined by acoustic stimulation and by mechanical round window stimulation at equivalent stapes velocities. Lee J; Seong K; Lee SH; Lee KY; Cho JH Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 314():65-71. PubMed ID: 24768763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective electrophysiologic findings of round window stimulation in a model of experimentally induced stapes fixation. Lupo JE; Koka K; Holland NJ; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1215-24. PubMed ID: 19779388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Third-window vibroplasty with an active middle ear implant: assessment of physiologic responses in a model of stapes fixation in Chinchilla lanigera. Lupo JE; Koka K; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 22334156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrocochleographic and mechanical assessment of round window stimulation with an active middle ear prosthesis. Koka K; Holland NJ; Lupo JE; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19720125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator. Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Round window membrane implantation with an active middle ear implant: a study of the effects on the performance of round window exposure and transducer tip diameter in human cadaveric temporal bones. Tringali S; Koka K; Deveze A; Holland NJ; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(5):291-302. PubMed ID: 20150727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of round-window stimulation of the cochlea in patients with stapedial otosclerosis. Zhang J; Tian J; Ta N; Rao Z J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4122. PubMed ID: 31893738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds. Greene NT; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ; Easter JR Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():16-30. PubMed ID: 28189837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of coupling techniques of an active middle ear device to the round window membrane for the backward stimulation of the cochlea. Gostian AO; Pazen D; Ortmann M; Luers JC; Anagiotos A; Hüttenbrink KB; Beutner D Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 25406868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical Energy Dissipation Through the Ossicular Chain and Inner Ear Using Laser Doppler Vibrometer Measurement of Round Window Velocity. Ryan M; Lally J; Adams JK; Higgins S; Ahmed M; Aden J; Esquivel C; Spear SA Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):e387-e391. PubMed ID: 31821262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physiological assessment of active middle ear implant coupling to the round window in Chinchilla lanigera. Lupo JE; Koka K; Hyde BJ; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 145(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 21593462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea. Stieger C; Rosowski JJ; Nakajima HH Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():105-14. PubMed ID: 23159918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Round window stimulation with an interface coupler demonstrates proof of concept. Frear DL; Nakajima HH Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 421():108512. PubMed ID: 35606210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A tri-coil bellows-type round window transducer with improved frequency characteristics for middle-ear implants. Shin DH; Seong KW; Puria S; Lee KY; Cho JH Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():144-154. PubMed ID: 27594098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic stimulation on the round window for active middle ear implants. Seong K; Lee K; Puria S; Cho JH Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jun; 97():171-177. PubMed ID: 29747060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct Acoustic Stimulation at the Lateral Canal: An Alternative Route to the Inner Ear? Verhaert N; Walraevens J; Desloovere C; Wouters J; Gérard JM PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160819. PubMed ID: 27500399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of methods for prediction of clinical output levels of active middle ear implants from measurements in human cadaveric ears. Grossöhmichen M; Waldmann B; Salcher R; Prenzler N; Lenarz T; Maier H Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15877. PubMed ID: 29158536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator. Chatzimichalis M; Sim JH; Huber AM Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 22739432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]