154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36963668)
1. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Urology Residency Match and Geographic Proximity of Applicants.
Wang KR; Shah YB; Simhal RK; Quinn A; Denisenko A; Mann E; Clark J; Raikin J; Lallas CD
Urology; 2023 Jun; 176():21-27. PubMed ID: 36963668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Asadourian PA; Murphy AI; Marano AA; Rohde CH; Wu JK
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):1923-1929. PubMed ID: 34210645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disparate Responses in Match Outcome across Competitive Surgical Subspecialties to Pandemic Era Constraints: An Analysis of Impacts of Minimal Auditions.
Faletsky A; Zitkovsky H; Guo L
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(1):243-248. PubMed ID: 34366285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Future is Female: The Influence of Female Faculty and Resident Representation on Female Applicant Match Rate Amongst Urology Residency Programs Over 3 Years.
Kapur A; Hung M; Wang K; Gross M; Lee W; Weissbart S; Kim J
Urology; 2022 Feb; 160():46-50. PubMed ID: 34740713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning From the 2021 Ophthalmology Match: Virtual Residency Matching During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Aggarwal S; Wisely CE; Syed M; Siatkowski RM; Challa P
J Grad Med Educ; 2022 Dec; 14(6):674-679. PubMed ID: 36591419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual "Matchmaking": Stakeholder Perspectives on the Future of the Urology Residency Match.
Warren CJ; Reitblat CR; Ferreri CA; Eyrich NW; Daignault-Newton S; Andino JJ; Sadeghi-Nejad H; Pruthi RS; Kraft KH
Urology; 2022 Jun; 164():11-17. PubMed ID: 35263640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. COVID-19 and the Otolaryngology Residency Match: Rising Incidence of Home Matches.
Bernstein JD; Harmon M; Watson D
Laryngoscope; 2022 Oct; 132(10):1934-1938. PubMed ID: 35038190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of COVID-19 on Plastic Surgery Home Program Match Rates.
Faletsky A; Zitkovsky H; Guo L
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jan; 88(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 34393193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors.
Movassaghi M; Lemack GE; Badalato GM; Broderick G; Greene K; Ibeziako O; Mirza M; Murphy A; Thavaseelan S; Wolter C; Takacs E
J Surg Educ; 2023 Jun; 80(6):900-906. PubMed ID: 36914481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Association Between Virtual Interviewing and Geographical Distribution of Matched Residency Programs for General Surgery Applicants.
Beesley H; Pernar L; Kettoola Y; Hess D
J Surg Educ; 2023 Feb; 80(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 36241484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Student You Know: Orthopedic Surgery Home Program Match Rates and Geographic Relationships Before and After COVID-19.
Nestler AJ; Feibel BM; Beason AM; Besserman K; Mounce SD; Bailey JR; Delfino KR; Allan DG
J Surg Educ; 2023 Mar; 80(3):476-482. PubMed ID: 36435733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Virtual Urology Residency Match Process: Moving Beyond the Pandemic.
Carpinito GP; Khouri RK; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul A; Caldwell KM; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():33-38. PubMed ID: 34280439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. #AUAMatch: The Impact of COVID-19 on Social Media Use in the Urology Residency Match.
Ho P; Margolin E; Sebesta E; Small A; Badalato GM
Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():50-56. PubMed ID: 34033828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Did More Otolaryngology Residency Applicants Match at Their Home Institutions in 2021? Investigating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Mulcahy CF; Terhaar SJ; Boulos S; Lee E; Zapanta PE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2022 Dec; 131(12):1375-1380. PubMed ID: 35081777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Virtual Interviews on the Geographic Distribution of Ophthalmology Match Results in the 2020-2021 Cycle.
Rasendran C; Rahman S; Younis U; Wadhwa R; Kapadia M; Lass JH; Ohsie-Bajor LH
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017); 2021 Jul; 13(2):e242-e246. PubMed ID: 37388845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Geographic Residency Placement Relative to Medical School Location.
Cotner CE; Mercadante SF; Shea JA
J Grad Med Educ; 2022 Feb; 14(1):108-111. PubMed ID: 35222828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geographic Trends in the Neurosurgery Match During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Moya AN; Whisonant CT; Shahriari SRK; McDonald CD; Ederle AC; Laarakker AS; Borah GL
Neurosurgery; 2023 May; 92(5):e104-e110. PubMed ID: 36705514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective.
Leopold Z; Rajagopalan A; Mikhail M; Lee G; Tabakin A; Park JH; Jang T; Elsamra SE; Singer EA
Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():33-37. PubMed ID: 36195167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining the Current Landscape of Women in Urology: An Analysis of Female Applicants, Residents, and Faculty at AUA-Accredited Residency Programs.
Findlay BL; Manka MG; Bole R; Dodge NA; Thompson RH; Granberg CF
Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():59-63. PubMed ID: 33301743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
