These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36965891)

  • 1. Concomitant pericervical reconstruction with sacrospinous hysteropexy: Anatomical and functional results.
    Ghanbari Z; Veisi F; Eftekhar T; Deldar M; Mostaan F; Adabi K
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 62(2):252-255. PubMed ID: 36965891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion.
    Achermann APP; Brazão ÉS; Riccetto CLZ; Palma PCR
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):856-857. PubMed ID: 30735341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Enklaar RA; Schulten SFM; van Eijndhoven HWF; Weemhoff M; van Leijsen SAL; van der Weide MC; van Bavel J; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Adang EMM; Kluivers KB;
    JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(7):626-635. PubMed ID: 37581670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision.
    Petruzzelli P; Chiadò Fiorio Tin M; Cosma S; Parisi S; Garofalo A; Todros T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 135(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 27352736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy through an anterior approach.
    Plair A; Dutta R; Overholt TL; Matthews C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1555-1563. PubMed ID: 33439280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
    Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transvaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy.
    Murphy AM; Goldman HB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Apr; 24(4):529-30. PubMed ID: 23224021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
    Hickman LC; Tran MC; Paraiso MFR; Walters MD; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 34586437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sacrospinous hysteropexy - an alternative in primary surgical treatment of apical compartment prolapse.
    Homola Prokop; Hensel Germund; Košťál Milan
    Ceska Gynekol; 2021; 86(3):200-204. PubMed ID: 34167313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    van Oudheusden AMJ; Coolen AWM; Hoskam H; Veen J; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):211-223. PubMed ID: 35482083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel bilateral anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy technique for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via the vaginal route: a cohort study.
    Naumann G; Börner C; Naumann LJ; Schröder S; Hüsch T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jul; 306(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 35288760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL
    Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.